Canada · Findings · Duplicate grant records in the data
UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN
Why it is here
Indicator “Duplicate grant records in the data” computed from public data: UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN — buyer dfatd-maecd 2021-10-25, CAD 137,310.
Indicators computed from public data sets: contracts, payments, registers, trade and sanctions lists. An indicator is a reason to check, not a decision of a public authority.
Details
- Company / subject
- UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN
- Buyer
- dfatd-maecd 2021-10-25
- Indicator
- Duplicate grant records in the data
- Amount
- CAD 137,310
- Found
- 8 October 2026
- Code
- K-23380
- Reference
- 2021-10-25
- Reference
- SEP-2021-CA-1-University
Other records of this company17
- 018 October 2026Findings · Competition bypassed by amendments
- 028 October 2026Findings · Competition bypassed by amendments
- 038 October 2026Findings · Competition bypassed by amendments
- 048 October 2026Findings · Duplicate grant records in the data
- 058 October 2026Findings · Duplicate grant records in the data
- 068 October 2026Findings · Duplicate grant records in the data
- 078 October 2026Findings · Contract splitting under the threshold
- 088 October 2026Findings · Contract splitting under the threshold
- 098 October 2026Findings · Contract value inflated by amendments
- 108 October 2026Findings · Same amount just under the threshold at several buyers
All 17
- 118 October 2026Findings · Lobbied the department, then a non-competitive contract from it within 90 days
- 128 October 2026Findings · Lobbied the department, then a non-competitive contract from it within 90 days
- 138 October 2026Findings · Lobbied the department, then a non-competitive contract from it within 90 days
- 148 October 2026Findings · Lobbied the department, then a non-competitive contract from it within 90 days
- 158 October 2026Findings · Lobbying meetings followed by denser non-competitive contracting
- 168 October 2026Findings · Lobbying meetings followed by denser non-competitive contracting
- 178 October 2026Findings · Lobbying meetings followed by denser non-competitive contracting