South Korea

Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · Bid rigging in a tender: fine: 2,139

Page 5 of 5

1 2 3 4 5

1. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

   주식회사 뉴보텍

   Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 23 January 2009 · decision 2009-041 · 아산시 상하수도사업소 발주 고강성 PVC 이중벽관 구매 입찰참가 5개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

2. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

   주식회사 평화

   Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 23 January 2009 · decision 2009-041 · 아산시 상하수도사업소 발주 고강성 PVC 이중벽관 구매 입찰참가 5개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

3. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

   주식회사 프라코

   Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 23 January 2009 · decision 2009-041 · 아산시 상하수도사업소 발주 고강성 PVC 이중벽관 구매 입찰참가 5개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

4. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

   주식회사 동우기업

   Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 30 December 2008 · decision 2008-326 · 대한주택공사 발주 발코니난간제작 입찰참가 사업자들의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

5. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

   신양씨에스 주식회사

   Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 30 December 2008 · decision 2008-326 · 대한주택공사 발주 발코니난간제작 입찰참가 사업자들의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

6. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

   모토로라코리아 주식회사

   Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 2 May 2008 · decision 2008-137 · 주파수공용통신장치 구매입찰관련 4개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

7. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

   주식회사 리노스

   Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 2 May 2008 · decision 2008-137 · 주파수공용통신장치 구매입찰관련 4개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

8. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

   회명산업 주식회사

   Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 2 May 2008 · decision 2008-137 · 주파수공용통신장치 구매입찰관련 4개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

9. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

   주식회사 씨그널정보통신

   Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 2 May 2008 · decision 2008-137 · 주파수공용통신장치 구매입찰관련 4개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

10. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 태일

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 29 January 2008 · decision 2008-039 · 충남 보령시 등 4개 지자체의 지적기록물 전산화작업 입찰참가 8개 소프트웨어사업자들의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

11. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 태일데이터

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 29 January 2008 · decision 2008-039 · 충남 보령시 등 4개 지자체의 지적기록물 전산화작업 입찰참가 8개 소프트웨어사업자들의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

12. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    괴산증평산림조합

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 27 December 2007 · decision 2007-564 · 충주시 임도구조개량사업 입찰참가 10개 충북지역 산림조합의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

13. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    단양군산림조합

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 27 December 2007 · decision 2007-564 · 충주시 임도구조개량사업 입찰참가 10개 충북지역 산림조합의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

14. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    보은군산림조합

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 27 December 2007 · decision 2007-564 · 충주시 임도구조개량사업 입찰참가 10개 충북지역 산림조합의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

15. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    옥천군산림조합

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 27 December 2007 · decision 2007-564 · 충주시 임도구조개량사업 입찰참가 10개 충북지역 산림조합의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

16. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    영동군산림조합

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 27 December 2007 · decision 2007-564 · 충주시 임도구조개량사업 입찰참가 10개 충북지역 산림조합의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

17. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    음성군산림조합

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 27 December 2007 · decision 2007-564 · 충주시 임도구조개량사업 입찰참가 10개 충북지역 산림조합의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

18. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    제천산림조합

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 27 December 2007 · decision 2007-564 · 충주시 임도구조개량사업 입찰참가 10개 충북지역 산림조합의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

19. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    진천군산림조합

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 27 December 2007 · decision 2007-564 · 충주시 임도구조개량사업 입찰참가 10개 충북지역 산림조합의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

20. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    청주청원산림조합

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 27 December 2007 · decision 2007-564 · 충주시 임도구조개량사업 입찰참가 10개 충북지역 산림조합의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

21. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    충주산림조합

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 27 December 2007 · decision 2007-564 · 충주시 임도구조개량사업 입찰참가 10개 충북지역 산림조합의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

22. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    대원지리정보 주식회사

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 6 September 2007 · decision 2007-438 · 대덕테크노밸리 2단계 배전관로 수치지도 및 탐사 용역 입찰(한전 서대전) 참가 5개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

23. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    대주항업 주식회사

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 6 September 2007 · decision 2007-438 · 대덕테크노밸리 2단계 배전관로 수치지도 및 탐사 용역 입찰(한전 서대전) 참가 5개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

24. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    대한항업 주식회사

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 6 September 2007 · decision 2007-438 · 대덕테크노밸리 2단계 배전관로 수치지도 및 탐사 용역 입찰(한전 서대전) 참가 5개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

25. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    한국종합설계 주식회사

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 6 September 2007 · decision 2007-438 · 대덕테크노밸리 2단계 배전관로 수치지도 및 탐사 용역 입찰(한전 서대전) 참가 5개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

26. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 에스케이건설

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 30 August 2007 · decision 2007-437 · 남강대상류 하수도시설 확충공사(제2권역) 입찰참가 3개 건설사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

27. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    금호산업 주식회사

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 30 August 2007 · decision 2007-437 · 남강대상류 하수도시설 확충공사(제2권역) 입찰참가 3개 건설사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

28. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    쌍용건설 주식회사

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 30 August 2007 · decision 2007-437 · 남강대상류 하수도시설 확충공사(제2권역) 입찰참가 3개 건설사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

29. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 대우건설

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 21 August 2007 · decision 2007-425 · 아산시 하수관거정비 BTL 민간투자사업 입찰 참가 2개 건설사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

30. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    벽산건설 주식회사

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 21 August 2007 · decision 2007-425 · 아산시 하수관거정비 BTL 민간투자사업 입찰 참가 2개 건설사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

31. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 대우건설

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 13 August 2007 · decision 2007-395 · 김해시 하수관거정비 BTL 민간투자사업 입찰 참가 2개 건설사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

32. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    경남기업 주식회사

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 13 August 2007 · decision 2007-395 · 김해시 하수관거정비 BTL 민간투자사업 입찰 참가 2개 건설사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

33. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 수성

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 5 April 2007 · decision 2007-202 · 경북 봉화군 발주 실시설계용역 입찰참가 3개사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

34. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 진양종합엔지니어링

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 5 April 2007 · decision 2007-202 · 경북 봉화군 발주 실시설계용역 입찰참가 3개사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

35. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 석우엔지니어링

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 5 April 2007 · decision 2007-202 · 경북 봉화군 발주 실시설계용역 입찰참가 3개사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

36. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 벽상엔지니어링

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 16 March 2007 · decision 2007-135 · 경북 청송군 발주 실시설계용역 입찰참가 3개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

37. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 천우엔지니어링

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 16 March 2007 · decision 2007-135 · 경북 청송군 발주 실시설계용역 입찰참가 3개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

38. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 성진엔지니어링

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 16 March 2007 · decision 2007-135 · 경북 청송군 발주 실시설계용역 입찰참가 3개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

39. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 건화이엔지

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 16 March 2007 · decision 2007-134 · 경북 울진군 발주 실시설계용역 입찰참가 3개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

40. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 반석엔지니어링

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 16 March 2007 · decision 2007-134 · 경북 울진군 발주 실시설계용역 입찰참가 3개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

41. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    삼우토목엔지니어링 주식회사

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 16 March 2007 · decision 2007-134 · 경북 울진군 발주 실시설계용역 입찰참가 3개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

42. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 태화건설엔지니어링

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 15 March 2007 · decision 2007-132 · 경북 영천시 발주 실시설계용역 입찰참가 3개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

43. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 대영종합엔지니어링

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 15 March 2007 · decision 2007-132 · 경북 영천시 발주 실시설계용역 입찰참가 3개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

44. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 학성건설엔지니어링

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 15 March 2007 · decision 2007-132 · 경북 영천시 발주 실시설계용역 입찰참가 3개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

45. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    한국제유공업협동조합

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 5 December 2006 · decision 2006-277 · 옥수수기름 군납입찰 참가 2개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

46. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    신양현미유 주식회사

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 5 December 2006 · decision 2006-277 · 옥수수기름 군납입찰 참가 2개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

47. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 덕일엔지니어링

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 23 October 2006 · decision 2006-240 · 경북 영덕군 발주 실시설계용역 입찰참가 4개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

48. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 한일엔지니어링

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 23 October 2006 · decision 2006-240 · 경북 영덕군 발주 실시설계용역 입찰참가 4개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

49. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 정도이앤씨

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 23 October 2006 · decision 2006-240 · 경북 영덕군 발주 실시설계용역 입찰참가 4개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

50. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 태창이엔씨

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 23 October 2006 · decision 2006-240 · 경북 영덕군 발주 실시설계용역 입찰참가 4개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

51. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 백광소재

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 13 October 2006 · decision 2006-234 · 현대제철(주)생석회구매입찰 참가 2개 업체의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

52. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 태영이엠시

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 13 October 2006 · decision 2006-234 · 현대제철(주)생석회구매입찰 참가 2개 업체의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

53. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 동신엔지니어링

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 13 October 2006 · decision 2006-236 · 경북고령군 발주 실시설계용역 입찰참가 2개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

54. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 진아토목엔지니어링

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 13 October 2006 · decision 2006-236 · 경북고령군 발주 실시설계용역 입찰참가 2개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

55. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 백광소재

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 13 October 2006 · decision 2006-233 · (주)포스코 생석회 구매입찰 참가 3개 업체의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

56. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 태영이엠시

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 13 October 2006 · decision 2006-233 · (주)포스코 생석회 구매입찰 참가 3개 업체의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

57. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 충무화학

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 13 October 2006 · decision 2006-233 · (주)포스코 생석회 구매입찰 참가 3개 업체의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

58. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 설계마당

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 13 October 2006 · decision 2006-238 · 경북예천군 발주 실시설계용역 입찰참가 2개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

59. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 세원

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 13 October 2006 · decision 2006-238 · 경북예천군 발주 실시설계용역 입찰참가 2개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

60. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 정도조경연구소

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 13 October 2006 · decision 2006-237 · 경북구미시 발주 실시설계용역 입찰참가 3개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

61. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 조경설계랜드아트

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 13 October 2006 · decision 2006-237 · 경북구미시 발주 실시설계용역 입찰참가 3개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

62. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 신후조경

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 13 October 2006 · decision 2006-237 · 경북구미시 발주 실시설계용역 입찰참가 3개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

63. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 백광소재

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 13 October 2006 · decision 2006-235 · 남해화학(주) 생석회 구매입찰 참가 3개 업체의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

64. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 태영이엠시

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 13 October 2006 · decision 2006-235 · 남해화학(주) 생석회 구매입찰 참가 3개 업체의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

65. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 우룡

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 13 October 2006 · decision 2006-235 · 남해화학(주) 생석회 구매입찰 참가 3개 업체의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

66. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 덕일엔지니어링

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 10 October 2006 · decision 2006-229 · 경북 의성군 발주 실시설계용역 입찰참가 3개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

67. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 보광이엔지

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 10 October 2006 · decision 2006-229 · 경북 의성군 발주 실시설계용역 입찰참가 3개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

68. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 대산종합기술공사

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 10 October 2006 · decision 2006-229 · 경북 의성군 발주 실시설계용역 입찰참가 3개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

69. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 대한그린

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 30 June 2006 · decision 2006-155 · 대전지역 4개 아파트 청소·소독용역 입찰참가 사업자들의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

70. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    대아개발 주식회사

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 30 June 2006 · decision 2006-155 · 대전지역 4개 아파트 청소·소독용역 입찰참가 사업자들의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

71. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    합자회사 화랑환경

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 30 June 2006 · decision 2006-155 · 대전지역 4개 아파트 청소·소독용역 입찰참가 사업자들의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

72. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    진명건설 주식회사

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 7 June 2006 · decision 2006-145 · 경산자동차고등학교 등의 옥상방수공사 입찰참가 4개사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

73. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    거산산업 주식회사

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 7 June 2006 · decision 2006-145 · 경산자동차고등학교 등의 옥상방수공사 입찰참가 4개사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

74. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 유니온건설

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 7 June 2006 · decision 2006-145 · 경산자동차고등학교 등의 옥상방수공사 입찰참가 4개사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

75. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    나라건설 주식회사

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 7 June 2006 · decision 2006-145 · 경산자동차고등학교 등의 옥상방수공사 입찰참가 4개사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

76. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 서홍기술 건축사사무소

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 16 March 2006 · decision 2006-054 · 경주시 등의 문화재관련 설계 및 감리용역입찰 참가 2개사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

77. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 고암

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 16 December 2005 · decision 2005-400 · 동국대학교일산불교병원 건물종합관리용역 입찰참가 5개 업체의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

78. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    원방기업 주식회사

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 16 December 2005 · decision 2005-400 · 동국대학교일산불교병원 건물종합관리용역 입찰참가 5개 업체의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

79. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    백상기업 주식회사

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 16 December 2005 · decision 2005-400 · 동국대학교일산불교병원 건물종합관리용역 입찰참가 5개 업체의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

80. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    신천개발 주식회사

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 16 December 2005 · decision 2005-400 · 동국대학교일산불교병원 건물종합관리용역 입찰참가 5개 업체의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

81. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    국제흥업 주식회사

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 16 December 2005 · decision 2005-400 · 동국대학교일산불교병원 건물종합관리용역 입찰참가 5개 업체의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

82. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    일성기계공업 주식회사

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 12 December 2005 · decision 2005-312 · 한국염색기술연구소 염색용 건조기 구매입찰참가 2개사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

83. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 대영

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 12 December 2005 · decision 2005-312 · 한국염색기술연구소 염색용 건조기 구매입찰참가 2개사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

84. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 고암

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 5 December 2005 · decision 2005-245 · 중앙유통단지 건물종합관리용역 입찰참가 5개 업체의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

85. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 관우개발

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 5 December 2005 · decision 2005-245 · 중앙유통단지 건물종합관리용역 입찰참가 5개 업체의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

86. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    신천개발 주식회사

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 5 December 2005 · decision 2005-245 · 중앙유통단지 건물종합관리용역 입찰참가 5개 업체의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

87. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    우지기업 주식회사

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 5 December 2005 · decision 2005-245 · 중앙유통단지 건물종합관리용역 입찰참가 5개 업체의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

88. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 한덕엔지니어링

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 5 December 2005 · decision 2005-245 · 중앙유통단지 건물종합관리용역 입찰참가 5개 업체의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

89. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    두산인프라코어 주식회사

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 24 June 2005 · decision 2005-082 · 정부기관 발주 지게차 구매입찰참가 3개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

90. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    현대중공업 주식회사

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 24 June 2005 · decision 2005-082 · 정부기관 발주 지게차 구매입찰참가 3개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

91. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 클라크머터리얼핸들링아시아

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 24 June 2005 · decision 2005-082 · 정부기관 발주 지게차 구매입찰참가 3개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

92. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    두산인프라코어 주식회사

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 24 June 2005 · decision 2005-083 · 정부기관 발주 굴삭기 및 휠로다 구매입찰참가 3개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

93. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    현대중공업 주식회사

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 24 June 2005 · decision 2005-083 · 정부기관 발주 굴삭기 및 휠로다 구매입찰참가 3개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

94. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    볼보건설기계코리아 주식회사

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 24 June 2005 · decision 2005-083 · 정부기관 발주 굴삭기 및 휠로다 구매입찰참가 3개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

95. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    대한벤딩 주식회사

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 8 March 2005 · decision 2005-046 · 서울특별시지하철 1~4호선 역구내편의시설물 임대입찰 참가사업자들의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

96. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 벤탈코리아

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 8 March 2005 · decision 2005-046 · 서울특별시지하철 1~4호선 역구내편의시설물 임대입찰 참가사업자들의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

97. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 보스크

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 8 March 2005 · decision 2005-046 · 서울특별시지하철 1~4호선 역구내편의시설물 임대입찰 참가사업자들의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

98. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    주식회사 동광레저개발

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 8 March 2005 · decision 2005-046 · 서울특별시지하철 1~4호선 역구내편의시설물 임대입찰 참가사업자들의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

99. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

    제천산림조합

    Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 22 November 2004 · decision 2004-303 · 제천시 경관조림사업 입찰참가 10개 충북지역산림조합의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

100. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     청주청원산림조합

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 22 November 2004 · decision 2004-303 · 제천시 경관조림사업 입찰참가 10개 충북지역산림조합의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

101. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     보은군산림조합

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 22 November 2004 · decision 2004-303 · 제천시 경관조림사업 입찰참가 10개 충북지역산림조합의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

102. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     옥천군산림조합

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 22 November 2004 · decision 2004-303 · 제천시 경관조림사업 입찰참가 10개 충북지역산림조합의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

103. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     영동군산림조합

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 22 November 2004 · decision 2004-303 · 제천시 경관조림사업 입찰참가 10개 충북지역산림조합의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

104. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     진천군산림조합

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 22 November 2004 · decision 2004-303 · 제천시 경관조림사업 입찰참가 10개 충북지역산림조합의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

105. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     괴산증평산림조합

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 22 November 2004 · decision 2004-303 · 제천시 경관조림사업 입찰참가 10개 충북지역산림조합의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

106. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     음성군산림조합

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 22 November 2004 · decision 2004-303 · 제천시 경관조림사업 입찰참가 10개 충북지역산림조합의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

107. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     충주산림조합

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 22 November 2004 · decision 2004-303 · 제천시 경관조림사업 입찰참가 10개 충북지역산림조합의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

108. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     단양군산림조합

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 22 November 2004 · decision 2004-303 · 제천시 경관조림사업 입찰참가 10개 충북지역산림조합의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

109. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     구전산전 주식회사

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 30 July 2004 · decision 2004-235 · LED교통신호등 구매입찰 참가 20개사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

110. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     주식회사 트래픽아이티에스

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 30 July 2004 · decision 2004-235 · LED교통신호등 구매입찰 참가 20개사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

111. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     한국전기교통 주식회사

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 30 July 2004 · decision 2004-235 · LED교통신호등 구매입찰 참가 20개사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

112. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     주식회사 자라다

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 30 July 2004 · decision 2004-235 · LED교통신호등 구매입찰 참가 20개사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

113. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     진우산전 주식회사

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 30 July 2004 · decision 2004-235 · LED교통신호등 구매입찰 참가 20개사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

114. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     주식회사 케이엘테크

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 30 July 2004 · decision 2004-235 · LED교통신호등 구매입찰 참가 20개사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

115. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     주식회사 서울테크놀로지

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 30 July 2004 · decision 2004-235 · LED교통신호등 구매입찰 참가 20개사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

116. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     태림전자 주식회사

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 30 July 2004 · decision 2004-235 · LED교통신호등 구매입찰 참가 20개사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

117. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     주식회사 신호

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 30 July 2004 · decision 2004-235 · LED교통신호등 구매입찰 참가 20개사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

118. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     주식회사 코이넬

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 30 July 2004 · decision 2004-235 · LED교통신호등 구매입찰 참가 20개사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

119. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     주식회사 이우애드

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 30 July 2004 · decision 2004-235 · LED교통신호등 구매입찰 참가 20개사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

120. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     주식회사 태경엔지니어링

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 30 July 2004 · decision 2004-235 · LED교통신호등 구매입찰 참가 20개사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

121. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     지엘신호조명 주식회사

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 30 July 2004 · decision 2004-235 · LED교통신호등 구매입찰 참가 20개사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

122. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     주식회사 한일에스티엠

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 30 July 2004 · decision 2004-235 · LED교통신호등 구매입찰 참가 20개사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

123. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     포올전자통신 주식회사

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 30 July 2004 · decision 2004-235 · LED교통신호등 구매입찰 참가 20개사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

124. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     사단법인 한국장애인고용안정협회

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 30 July 2004 · decision 2004-235 · LED교통신호등 구매입찰 참가 20개사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

125. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     주식회사 녹십자피비엠

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 9 February 2004 · decision 2004-035 · 지방공사 강남병원 등의 백신구매입찰 참가 7개 제약회사들의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

126. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     동신제약 주식회사

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 9 February 2004 · decision 2004-035 · 지방공사 강남병원 등의 백신구매입찰 참가 7개 제약회사들의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

127. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     동아제약 주식회사

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 9 February 2004 · decision 2004-035 · 지방공사 강남병원 등의 백신구매입찰 참가 7개 제약회사들의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

128. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     보령제약 주식회사

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 9 February 2004 · decision 2004-035 · 지방공사 강남병원 등의 백신구매입찰 참가 7개 제약회사들의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

129. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     씨제이 주식회사

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 9 February 2004 · decision 2004-035 · 지방공사 강남병원 등의 백신구매입찰 참가 7개 제약회사들의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

130. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     주식회사 엘지생명과학

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 9 February 2004 · decision 2004-035 · 지방공사 강남병원 등의 백신구매입찰 참가 7개 제약회사들의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

131. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     주식회사 한국백신

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 9 February 2004 · decision 2004-035 · 지방공사 강남병원 등의 백신구매입찰 참가 7개 제약회사들의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

132. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     주식회사한보

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 6 September 2002 · decision 2002-182 · 한국지역난방공사 이중보온관 구매입찰 참가 4개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

133. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     주식회사세아제강

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 6 September 2002 · decision 2002-182 · 한국지역난방공사 이중보온관 구매입찰 참가 4개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

134. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     구월철강주식회사

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 6 September 2002 · decision 2002-182 · 한국지역난방공사 이중보온관 구매입찰 참가 4개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

135. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     광일케미스틸주식회사

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 6 September 2002 · decision 2002-182 · 한국지역난방공사 이중보온관 구매입찰 참가 4개 사업자의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

136. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     두산건설주식회사

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 20 July 2002 · decision 2002-155 · 서울시지하철9호선909공구건설공사입찰참가2개사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

137. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     현대산업개발주식회사

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 20 July 2002 · decision 2002-155 · 서울시지하철9호선909공구건설공사입찰참가2개사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

138. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     현대산업개발주식회사

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 20 July 2002 · decision 2002-156 · 서울시 지하철9호선 903공구 건설공사 입찰참가 2개사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

139. Bid rigging in a tender: fine

     두산건설주식회사

     Authority Korea Fair Trade Commission (공정거래위원회) · From 20 July 2002 · decision 2002-156 · 서울시 지하철9호선 903공구 건설공사 입찰참가 2개사의 부당한 공동행위에 대한 건 · unfair concerted practice under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act; the decision may have been appealed in court · Source

1 2 3 4 5

South Korea