Indonesia

Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999): 670

Page 1 of 2

1 2

1. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

   PT Jaya Semanggi Enjiniring

   Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 26 January 2026 · case 03/KPPU-L/2025 · TENDER PEMBANGUNAN GEDUNG RUMAH SAKIT KABUPATEN BOGOR, KELURAHAN COGREG, KECAMATAN PARUNG, KABUPATEN BOGOR (BANPROV) TAHUN ANGGARAN 2021 · fine IDR 2,000,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

2. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

   PT Permata Anugerah Yalapersada

   Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 26 January 2026 · case 03/KPPU-L/2025 · TENDER PEMBANGUNAN GEDUNG RUMAH SAKIT KABUPATEN BOGOR, KELURAHAN COGREG, KECAMATAN PARUNG, KABUPATEN BOGOR (BANPROV) TAHUN ANGGARAN 2021 · fine IDR 1,000,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

3. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

   PT Dieselindo Utama Nusa

   Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 29 December 2025 · case 07/KPPU-L/2025 · TENDER PEMELIHARAAN MESIN INDUK MTU DI DITJEN BEA DAN CUKAI TAHUN 2024 · fine IDR 1,000,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

4. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

   PT Rolls Royce Solutions Indonesia

   Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 29 December 2025 · case 07/KPPU-L/2025 · TENDER PEMELIHARAAN MESIN INDUK MTU DI DITJEN BEA DAN CUKAI TAHUN 2024 · fine IDR 1,500,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

5. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

   PT Arkindo

   Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 28 July 2025 · case 17/KPPU-L/2024 · PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN JEMBATAN SINTONG KABUPATEN ROKAN HILIR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2023 · fine IDR 1,000,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

6. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

   PT Fatma Nusa Mulia

   Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 28 July 2025 · case 17/KPPU-L/2024 · PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN JEMBATAN SINTONG KABUPATEN ROKAN HILIR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2023 · barred from tenders for 2 years (Provinsi Riau) · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

7. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

   CV Sarana Chaini

   Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 28 July 2025 · case 17/KPPU-L/2024 · PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN JEMBATAN SINTONG KABUPATEN ROKAN HILIR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2023 · barred from tenders for 2 years (Provinsi Riau) · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

8. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

   CV Aska Jaya Kontraktor

   Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 28 July 2025 · case 17/KPPU-L/2024 · PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN JEMBATAN SINTONG KABUPATEN ROKAN HILIR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2023 · barred from tenders for 2 years (Provinsi Riau) · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

9. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

   PT CRRC Sifang Indonesia

   Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 22 July 2025 · case 14/KPPU-L/2024 · PENGADAAN TRANSPORTASI DARAT UNTUK PEMASOKAN ELECTRIC MULTIPLE UNIT (EMU) UNTUK PROYEK JAKARTA BANDUNG HIGH SPEED RAILWAYS PROJECT · fine IDR 2,000,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

10. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Anugerah Logistik Prestasindo

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 22 July 2025 · case 14/KPPU-L/2024 · PENGADAAN TRANSPORTASI DARAT UNTUK PEMASOKAN ELECTRIC MULTIPLE UNIT (EMU) UNTUK PROYEK JAKARTA BANDUNG HIGH SPEED RAILWAYS PROJECT · fine IDR 2,000,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

11. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    Perusahaan Umum Daerah (PERUMDA) Air Minum Amerta Dayan Gunung

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 30 June 2025 · case 11/KPPU-L/2024 · PENGADAAN BADAN USAHA PENYEDIA AIR BERSIH DENGAN TEKNOLOGI SWRO (PRAKARSA BADAN USAHA) PADA PERUSAHAAN DAERAH AIR MINUM (PDAM) KABUPATEN LOMBOK UTARA TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · fine IDR 8,000,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

12. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Tiara Cipta Nirwana

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 30 June 2025 · case 11/KPPU-L/2024 · PENGADAAN BADAN USAHA PENYEDIA AIR BERSIH DENGAN TEKNOLOGI SWRO (PRAKARSA BADAN USAHA) PADA PERUSAHAAN DAERAH AIR MINUM (PDAM) KABUPATEN LOMBOK UTARA TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · fine IDR 4,000,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

13. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Buana Prima Raya

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 10 December 2024 · case 02/KPPU-L/2024 · PENGADAAN CRYO-EM, TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPE (TEM) ROOM TEMPERATURE FOR LIFE SCIENCE DAN TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPE (TEM) FOR MATERIAL SCIENCE PADA SATUAN KERJA DEPUTI BIDANG INFRASTRUKTUR RISET DAN INOVASI, BADAN RISET DAN INOVASI NASIONAL TAHUN ANGGARAN 2022 · fine IDR 1,000,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

14. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Multi Teknindo Infotronika

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 10 December 2024 · case 02/KPPU-L/2024 · PENGADAAN CRYO-EM, TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPE (TEM) ROOM TEMPERATURE FOR LIFE SCIENCE DAN TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPE (TEM) FOR MATERIAL SCIENCE PADA SATUAN KERJA DEPUTI BIDANG INFRASTRUKTUR RISET DAN INOVASI, BADAN RISET DAN INOVASI NASIONAL TAHUN ANGGARAN 2022 · fine IDR 28,000,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

15. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Sumber Bangun Sentosa

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 30 September 2024 · case 18/KPPU-L/2023 · PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI PADA SATUAN KERJA UNIT PENYELENGGARA PELABUHAN KELAS II NUSA PENIDA KEMENTERIAN PERHUBUNGAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2022 · fine IDR 1,500,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

16. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Pacific Multindo Permai

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 30 September 2024 · case 18/KPPU-L/2023 · PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI PADA SATUAN KERJA UNIT PENYELENGGARA PELABUHAN KELAS II NUSA PENIDA KEMENTERIAN PERHUBUNGAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2022 · barred from tenders for 1 year · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

17. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Pilar Atmoko Konstruksi

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 30 September 2024 · case 18/KPPU-L/2023 · PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI PADA SATUAN KERJA UNIT PENYELENGGARA PELABUHAN KELAS II NUSA PENIDA KEMENTERIAN PERHUBUNGAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2022 · barred from tenders for 1 year · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

18. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Tri Karya Utama Cendana

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 30 September 2024 · case 18/KPPU-L/2023 · PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI PADA SATUAN KERJA UNIT PENYELENGGARA PELABUHAN KELAS II NUSA PENIDA KEMENTERIAN PERHUBUNGAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2022 · barred from tenders for 1 year · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

19. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Lambok Ulina

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 8 December 2023 · case 15-KPPU-L-2023 · PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI PENINGKATAN JALAN KANDANG RODA-PAKANSARI KABUPATEN BOGOR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2021 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

20. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Tureloto Battu Indah

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 8 December 2023 · case 15-KPPU-L-2023 · PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI PENINGKATAN JALAN KANDANG RODA-PAKANSARI KABUPATEN BOGOR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2021 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

21. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Wanita Mandiri Perkasa

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 5 December 2023 · case 08/KPPU-L/2023 · PENGADAAN PAKET PEKERJAAN PENINGKATAN JALAN PEUREULAK-LOKOP-BATAS GAYO LUES (P.035.11) (SEGMEN 3) (MYC) DI PROVINSI ACEH TAHUN ANGGARAN 2020-2022 · fine IDR 1,500,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

22. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Tamiang Karya

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 5 December 2023 · case 08/KPPU-L/2023 · PENGADAAN PAKET PEKERJAAN PENINGKATAN JALAN PEUREULAK-LOKOP-BATAS GAYO LUES (P.035.11) (SEGMEN 3) (MYC) DI PROVINSI ACEH TAHUN ANGGARAN 2020-2022 · fine IDR 1,000,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

23. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Andesmont Sakti

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 5 December 2023 · case 08/KPPU-L/2023 · PENGADAAN PAKET PEKERJAAN PENINGKATAN JALAN PEUREULAK-LOKOP-BATAS GAYO LUES (P.035.11) (SEGMEN 3) (MYC) DI PROVINSI ACEH TAHUN ANGGARAN 2020-2022 · fine IDR 1,900,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

24. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Galih Medan Persada

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 5 December 2023 · case 08/KPPU-L/2023 · PENGADAAN PAKET PEKERJAAN PENINGKATAN JALAN PEUREULAK-LOKOP-BATAS GAYO LUES (P.035.11) (SEGMEN 3) (MYC) DI PROVINSI ACEH TAHUN ANGGARAN 2020-2022 · fine IDR 1,000,000,000 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

25. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Len Industri (Persero)

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 15 August 2023 · case 18/KPPU-L/2022 · PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN SISTEM PERSINYALAN ELEKTRIK JALUR GANDA KERETA API LINTAS BOGOR – CICURUG PADA SATUAN KERJA BALAI TEKNIK PERKERETAAPIAN WILAYAH JAWA BAGIAN BARAT KEMENTERIAN PERHUBUNGAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2019-2021 (KODE TENDER 59035114) · fine IDR 6,058,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

26. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Len Railway Systems

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 15 August 2023 · case 18/KPPU-L/2022 · PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN SISTEM PERSINYALAN ELEKTRIK JALUR GANDA KERETA API LINTAS BOGOR – CICURUG PADA SATUAN KERJA BALAI TEKNIK PERKERETAAPIAN WILAYAH JAWA BAGIAN BARAT KEMENTERIAN PERHUBUNGAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2019-2021 (KODE TENDER 59035114) · fine IDR 4,915,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

27. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Jakarta Propertindo (Perseroda)

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 18 July 2023 · case 17/KPPU-L/2022 · PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN PELAKSANAAN PROYEK REVITALISASI PUSAT KESENIAN JAKARTA TAMAN ISMAIL MARZUKI TAHAP III · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

28. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Pembangunan Perumahan (Persero), Tbk

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 18 July 2023 · case 17/KPPU-L/2022 · PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN PELAKSANAAN PROYEK REVITALISASI PUSAT KESENIAN JAKARTA TAMAN ISMAIL MARZUKI TAHAP III · fine IDR 16,800,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

29. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Jaya Konstruksi Manggala Pratama, Tbk

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 18 July 2023 · case 17/KPPU-L/2022 · PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN PELAKSANAAN PROYEK REVITALISASI PUSAT KESENIAN JAKARTA TAMAN ISMAIL MARZUKI TAHAP III · fine IDR 11,200,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

30. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Cipta Karya Multi Teknik

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 25 January 2022 · case 25/KPPU-I/2020 · PENGADAAN PAKET PEMBANGUNAN REVETMENT DAN PENGURUGAN LAHAN DI PELABUHAN PERIKANAN POPOH KABUPATEN TULUNGAGUNG TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · fine IDR 2,700,000,000 · barred from tenders for 1 year (Indonesia) · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

31. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Bangun Konstruksi Persada

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 25 January 2022 · case 25/KPPU-I/2020 · PENGADAAN PAKET PEMBANGUNAN REVETMENT DAN PENGURUGAN LAHAN DI PELABUHAN PERIKANAN POPOH KABUPATEN TULUNGAGUNG TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · barred from tenders for 1 year (Indonesia) · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

32. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Wahana Eka Sakti

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 25 January 2022 · case 25/KPPU-I/2020 · PENGADAAN PAKET PEMBANGUNAN REVETMENT DAN PENGURUGAN LAHAN DI PELABUHAN PERIKANAN POPOH KABUPATEN TULUNGAGUNG TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · barred from tenders for 1 year (Indonesia) · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

33. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Tiara Multi Teknik

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 25 January 2022 · case 25/KPPU-I/2020 · PENGADAAN PAKET PEMBANGUNAN REVETMENT DAN PENGURUGAN LAHAN DI PELABUHAN PERIKANAN POPOH KABUPATEN TULUNGAGUNG TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · barred from tenders for 1 year (Indonesia) · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

34. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Metro Lestari Utama

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 December 2021 · case 35/KPPU-I/2020 · PENGADAAN PAKET PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI JALAN (PROGRAM PERCEPATAN) PAKET 3 (PELANGAN-SP. PENGANTAP 3) DAN PAKET 4 (PELANGAN-SP. PENGANTAP 4) PADA SATKER DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM DAN PENATAAN RUANG PROPINSI NUSA TENGGARA BARAT APBD TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017-2018 · fine IDR 1,359,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

35. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Eka Praya Jaya

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 December 2021 · case 35/KPPU-I/2020 · PENGADAAN PAKET PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI JALAN (PROGRAM PERCEPATAN) PAKET 3 (PELANGAN-SP. PENGANTAP 3) DAN PAKET 4 (PELANGAN-SP. PENGANTAP 4) PADA SATKER DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM DAN PENATAAN RUANG PROPINSI NUSA TENGGARA BARAT APBD TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017-2018 · fine IDR 1,149,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

36. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Sarang Tehnik Canggih

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 16 November 2021 · case 32/KPPU-I/2020 · PENGADAAN PAKET PEKERJAAN JALAN SEI SAREN – TELUK NILAU – SENYERANG – BTS. RIAU DI LINGKUNGAN DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM DAN PERUMAHAN RAKYAT PEMERINTAH DAERAH PROVINSI JAMBI APBD TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

37. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Cipayung Bakti Mandiri

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 16 November 2021 · case 32/KPPU-I/2020 · PENGADAAN PAKET PEKERJAAN JALAN SEI SAREN – TELUK NILAU – SENYERANG – BTS. RIAU DI LINGKUNGAN DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM DAN PERUMAHAN RAKYAT PEMERINTAH DAERAH PROVINSI JAMBI APBD TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

38. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Adhikarya Teknik Perkasa

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 24 August 2021 · case 36/KPPU-I/2020 · LARANGAN PRAKTEK MONOPOLI DAN/ATAU PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT (UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1999) TERKAIT PENGADAAN PAKET REHABILITASI DAN RENOVASI SARANA DAN PRASARANA SEKOLAH KABUPATEN INDRAGIRI HILIR 1 DAN 2 APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2019 · fine IDR 2,050,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

39. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Kalber Reksa Abadi

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 24 August 2021 · case 36/KPPU-I/2020 · LARANGAN PRAKTEK MONOPOLI DAN/ATAU PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT (UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1999) TERKAIT PENGADAAN PAKET REHABILITASI DAN RENOVASI SARANA DAN PRASARANA SEKOLAH KABUPATEN INDRAGIRI HILIR 1 DAN 2 APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2019 · fine IDR 1,980,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

40. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Perkasa Jaya Inti Persada

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 19 August 2021 · case 24/KPPU-I/2020 · PENGADAAN PAKET PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN JANGKAR KABUPATEN SITUBONDO TAHUN ANGGARAN 2018 · fine IDR 1,250,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

41. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Kurniadjaja Wirabhakti

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 19 August 2021 · case 24/KPPU-I/2020 · PENGADAAN PAKET PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN JANGKAR KABUPATEN SITUBONDO TAHUN ANGGARAN 2018 · fine IDR 1,000,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

42. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Duta Ekonomi

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 19 August 2021 · case 24/KPPU-I/2020 · PENGADAAN PAKET PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN JANGKAR KABUPATEN SITUBONDO TAHUN ANGGARAN 2018 · fine IDR 1,000,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

43. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Kurniadjaja Wirabhakti

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 30 July 2021 · case 28/KPPU-I/2020 · PENGADAAN PAKET PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN PENYEBERANGAN PACIRAN KABUPATEN LAMONGAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2018 · fine IDR 1,470,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

44. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Dian Sentosa

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 30 July 2021 · case 28/KPPU-I/2020 · PENGADAAN PAKET PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN PENYEBERANGAN PACIRAN KABUPATEN LAMONGAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2018 · fine IDR 200,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

45. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Mahakarya Tunggal Abadi

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 30 July 2021 · case 28/KPPU-I/2020 · PENGADAAN PAKET PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN PENYEBERANGAN PACIRAN KABUPATEN LAMONGAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2018 · fine IDR 150,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

46. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Mina Fajar Abadi

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 11 February 2021 · case 04/KPPU-L/2020 · TENDER PAKET PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN RUMAH SAKIT RUJUKAN REGIONAL LANGSA SATKER DINAS KESEHATAN ACEH PEMERINTAH DAERAH PROVINSI ACEH TAHUN ANGGARAN 2018 (KODE LELANG: 17684106) · fine IDR 1,723,500,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

47. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Cahayahikmah Jayapratama

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 28 January 2021 · case 05/KPPU-I/2020 · LARANGAN PRAKTEK MONOPOLI DAN/ATAU PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT (UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1999) TERKAIT PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN GEDUNG KOLAM RENANG TAHAP II KECAMATAN KANDANGAN KABUPATEN HULU SUNGAI SELATAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · fine IDR 1,350,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

48. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Karya Kandangan Nasional

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 28 January 2021 · case 05/KPPU-I/2020 · LARANGAN PRAKTEK MONOPOLI DAN/ATAU PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT (UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1999) TERKAIT PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN GEDUNG KOLAM RENANG TAHAP II KECAMATAN KANDANGAN KABUPATEN HULU SUNGAI SELATAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

49. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Diang Ingsun Mandiri

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 28 January 2021 · case 05/KPPU-I/2020 · LARANGAN PRAKTEK MONOPOLI DAN/ATAU PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT (UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1999) TERKAIT PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN GEDUNG KOLAM RENANG TAHAP II KECAMATAN KANDANGAN KABUPATEN HULU SUNGAI SELATAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

50. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Ikhlas Bangun Sarana

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 7 January 2021 · case 30/KPPU-I/2019 · TENDER PEMBANGUNAN JALAN RUAS NGAJAM – APULEA SEGMEN III (DESA NGAJAM – APULEA) PADA SATKER DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM DAN PENATAAN RUANG PEMERINTAH DAERAH KABUPATEN HALMAHERA UTARA APBD TAHUN ANGGARAN 2018 - 2020 (KODE TENDER: 1455233) · fine IDR 1,100,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

51. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Hapsari Nusantara Gemilang

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 7 January 2021 · case 30/KPPU-I/2019 · TENDER PEMBANGUNAN JALAN RUAS NGAJAM – APULEA SEGMEN III (DESA NGAJAM – APULEA) PADA SATKER DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM DAN PENATAAN RUANG PEMERINTAH DAERAH KABUPATEN HALMAHERA UTARA APBD TAHUN ANGGARAN 2018 - 2020 (KODE TENDER: 1455233) · fine IDR 1,000,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

52. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Cipta Aksara Perkasa

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 7 January 2021 · case 30/KPPU-I/2019 · TENDER PEMBANGUNAN JALAN RUAS NGAJAM – APULEA SEGMEN III (DESA NGAJAM – APULEA) PADA SATKER DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM DAN PENATAAN RUANG PEMERINTAH DAERAH KABUPATEN HALMAHERA UTARA APBD TAHUN ANGGARAN 2018 - 2020 (KODE TENDER: 1455233) · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

53. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Rajawali Jaya Sakti Contrindo

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 10 November 2020 · case 22/KPPU-I/2019 · PELELANGAN UMUM PAKET PEKERJAAN LANJUTAN PEMBANGUNAN JARINGAN DISTRIBUSI AIR BERSIH (MULTIYEARS) KABUPATEN PENAJAM PASER UTARA, KALIMANTAN TIMUR, APBD TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015-2018 (KODE LELANG 1684264) · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

54. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Indah Seratama

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 10 November 2020 · case 22/KPPU-I/2019 · PELELANGAN UMUM PAKET PEKERJAAN LANJUTAN PEMBANGUNAN JARINGAN DISTRIBUSI AIR BERSIH (MULTIYEARS) KABUPATEN PENAJAM PASER UTARA, KALIMANTAN TIMUR, APBD TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015-2018 (KODE LELANG 1684264) · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

55. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum (PDAM) Way Rilau Kota Bandar Lampung

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 26 February 2020 · case 14/KPPU-L/2019 · PELELANGAN PROYEK KERJA SAMA PEMERINTAH DENGAN BADAN USAHA TERKAIT SISTEM PENYEDIAAN AIR MINUM DI KOTA BANDAR LAMPUNG · fine IDR 1,747,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

56. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Bangun Cipta Kontraktor

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 26 February 2020 · case 14/KPPU-L/2019 · PELELANGAN PROYEK KERJA SAMA PEMERINTAH DENGAN BADAN USAHA TERKAIT SISTEM PENYEDIAAN AIR MINUM DI KOTA BANDAR LAMPUNG · fine IDR 3,843,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

57. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Bangun Tjipta Sarana

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 26 February 2020 · case 14/KPPU-L/2019 · PELELANGAN PROYEK KERJA SAMA PEMERINTAH DENGAN BADAN USAHA TERKAIT SISTEM PENYEDIAAN AIR MINUM DI KOTA BANDAR LAMPUNG · fine IDR 2,358,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

58. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Agung Perdana Bulukumba

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 September 2019 · case 16/KPPU-I/2018 · PEKERJAAN PEMELIHARAAN BERKALA JALAN BATEBALLA-JATIA CS PADA SATUAN KERJA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM DAN PENATAAN RUANG KABUPATEN BANTAENG, APBD TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · fine IDR 4,066,900,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

59. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Nurul Ilham Pratama

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 September 2019 · case 16/KPPU-I/2018 · PEKERJAAN PEMELIHARAAN BERKALA JALAN BATEBALLA-JATIA CS PADA SATUAN KERJA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM DAN PENATAAN RUANG KABUPATEN BANTAENG, APBD TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

60. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Yunita Putri Tunggal

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 September 2019 · case 16/KPPU-I/2018 · PEKERJAAN PEMELIHARAAN BERKALA JALAN BATEBALLA-JATIA CS PADA SATUAN KERJA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM DAN PENATAAN RUANG KABUPATEN BANTAENG, APBD TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

61. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Agung Perdana Bulukumba

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 September 2019 · case 17/KPPU-I/2018 · TENDER PENINGKATAN JALAN KAMPUNG BAKARA-SABBANNYANG PADA SATUAN KERJA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM DAN PENATAAN RUANG KABUPATEN BANTAENG, APBD TAHUN ANGGARAN 2018 · fine IDR 2,963,200,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

62. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Nurul Ilham Pratama

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 September 2019 · case 17/KPPU-I/2018 · TENDER PENINGKATAN JALAN KAMPUNG BAKARA-SABBANNYANG PADA SATUAN KERJA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM DAN PENATAAN RUANG KABUPATEN BANTAENG, APBD TAHUN ANGGARAN 2018 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

63. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Yunita Putri Tunggal

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 September 2019 · case 17/KPPU-I/2018 · TENDER PENINGKATAN JALAN KAMPUNG BAKARA-SABBANNYANG PADA SATUAN KERJA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM DAN PENATAAN RUANG KABUPATEN BANTAENG, APBD TAHUN ANGGARAN 2018 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

64. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Kediri Putra

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 11 September 2019 · case 21/KPPU-I/2018 · PELELANGAN PAKET PEKERJAAN PENINGKATAN JALAN (KODE LELANG 583207) DAN PAKET PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN JALAN (KODE LELANG 584207) PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN KEDIRI SUMBER DANA DAU APBD KABUPATEN KEDIRI TA 2016 · fine IDR 6,746,894,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

65. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Triple S Indosedulur

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 11 September 2019 · case 21/KPPU-I/2018 · PELELANGAN PAKET PEKERJAAN PENINGKATAN JALAN (KODE LELANG 583207) DAN PAKET PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN JALAN (KODE LELANG 584207) PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN KEDIRI SUMBER DANA DAU APBD KABUPATEN KEDIRI TA 2016 · fine IDR 6,746,894,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

66. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Ayem Mulya Indah

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 11 September 2019 · case 21/KPPU-I/2018 · PELELANGAN PAKET PEKERJAAN PENINGKATAN JALAN (KODE LELANG 583207) DAN PAKET PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN JALAN (KODE LELANG 584207) PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN KEDIRI SUMBER DANA DAU APBD KABUPATEN KEDIRI TA 2016 · fine IDR 1,927,684,000 · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

67. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Ratna

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 11 September 2019 · case 21/KPPU-I/2018 · PELELANGAN PAKET PEKERJAAN PENINGKATAN JALAN (KODE LELANG 583207) DAN PAKET PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN JALAN (KODE LELANG 584207) PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN KEDIRI SUMBER DANA DAU APBD KABUPATEN KEDIRI TA 2016 · fine IDR 1,927,684,000 · respondent VI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

68. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Jatisono Multi Konstruksi

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 11 September 2019 · case 21/KPPU-I/2018 · PELELANGAN PAKET PEKERJAAN PENINGKATAN JALAN (KODE LELANG 583207) DAN PAKET PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN JALAN (KODE LELANG 584207) PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN KEDIRI SUMBER DANA DAU APBD KABUPATEN KEDIRI TA 2016 · fine IDR 1,760,059,000 · respondent VII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

69. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Kediri Putra

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 11 September 2019 · case 22/KPPU-I/2018 · PELELANGAN PAKET PEKERJAAN PENINGKATAN JALAN RIGID PAVEMENT RUAS WATES-PLOSOKLATEN (KODE LELANG 620207) PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM SUMBER DANA ALOKASI KHUSUS INFRASTRUKTUR PUBLIK DAERAH (DAK IPD) BIDANG JALAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2016 · fine IDR 3,250,611,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

70. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Ayem Mulya Abadi

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 11 September 2019 · case 22/KPPU-I/2018 · PELELANGAN PAKET PEKERJAAN PENINGKATAN JALAN RIGID PAVEMENT RUAS WATES-PLOSOKLATEN (KODE LELANG 620207) PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM SUMBER DANA ALOKASI KHUSUS INFRASTRUKTUR PUBLIK DAERAH (DAK IPD) BIDANG JALAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2016 · fine IDR 1,000,000,000 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

71. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Ayem Mulya Aspalmix

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 11 September 2019 · case 22/KPPU-I/2018 · PELELANGAN PAKET PEKERJAAN PENINGKATAN JALAN RIGID PAVEMENT RUAS WATES-PLOSOKLATEN (KODE LELANG 620207) PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM SUMBER DANA ALOKASI KHUSUS INFRASTRUKTUR PUBLIK DAERAH (DAK IPD) BIDANG JALAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2016 · fine IDR 1,000,000,000 · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

72. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Ratna

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 11 September 2019 · case 22/KPPU-I/2018 · PELELANGAN PAKET PEKERJAAN PENINGKATAN JALAN RIGID PAVEMENT RUAS WATES-PLOSOKLATEN (KODE LELANG 620207) PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM SUMBER DANA ALOKASI KHUSUS INFRASTRUKTUR PUBLIK DAERAH (DAK IPD) BIDANG JALAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2016 · fine IDR 1,000,000,000 · respondent VI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

73. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Usaha Sederhana Bersama

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 September 2019 · case 12/KPPU-I/2018 · PENINGKATAN JALAN DALAM KOTA TANA PASER (MULTIYEARS 2 TAHUN) PADA DINAS BINA MARGA, PENGAIRAN DAN TATA RUANG KABUPATEN PASER, KALIMANTAN TIMUR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014-2015 · fine IDR 2,135,062,440 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

74. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Fajar Pasir Lestari

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 September 2019 · case 12/KPPU-I/2018 · PENINGKATAN JALAN DALAM KOTA TANA PASER (MULTIYEARS 2 TAHUN) PADA DINAS BINA MARGA, PENGAIRAN DAN TATA RUANG KABUPATEN PASER, KALIMANTAN TIMUR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014-2015 · fine IDR 1,000,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

75. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    CV Cakrawala

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 September 2019 · case 12/KPPU-I/2018 · PENINGKATAN JALAN DALAM KOTA TANA PASER (MULTIYEARS 2 TAHUN) PADA DINAS BINA MARGA, PENGAIRAN DAN TATA RUANG KABUPATEN PASER, KALIMANTAN TIMUR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014-2015 · fine IDR 1,000,000,000 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

76. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Haka Utama

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 3 September 2019 · case 10/KPPU-I/2018 · PELELANGAN PEMBANGUNAN RUMAH SAKIT PADA SATUAN KERJA DINAS KESEHATAN KOTA MAKASSAR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017-APBD · fine IDR 2,852,384,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

77. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Seven Brothers Multisarana

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 3 September 2019 · case 10/KPPU-I/2018 · PELELANGAN PEMBANGUNAN RUMAH SAKIT PADA SATUAN KERJA DINAS KESEHATAN KOTA MAKASSAR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017-APBD · fine IDR 1,901,589,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

78. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Restu Agung Perkasa

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 3 September 2019 · case 10/KPPU-I/2018 · PELELANGAN PEMBANGUNAN RUMAH SAKIT PADA SATUAN KERJA DINAS KESEHATAN KOTA MAKASSAR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017-APBD · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

79. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Mitha Sarana Niaga

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 30 August 2019 · case 18/KPPU-L/2018 · PEMBANGUNAN JALAN AKSES BANDARA SIBISA PADA SATUAN KERJA PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL WILAYAH I PROVINSI SUMATERA UTARA APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2018 · fine IDR 1,253,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

80. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Razasa Karya

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 30 August 2019 · case 18/KPPU-L/2018 · PEMBANGUNAN JALAN AKSES BANDARA SIBISA PADA SATUAN KERJA PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL WILAYAH I PROVINSI SUMATERA UTARA APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2018 · fine IDR 1,000,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

81. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Swakarsa Tunggal Mandiri

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 29 August 2019 · case 23/KPPU-L/2018 · TENDER PRESERVASI DAN PELEBARAN JALAN BTS. PROVINSI ACEH - BARUS - SIBOLGA PADA SATKER PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL WILAYAH II PROVINSI SUMATERA UTARA APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2018 · fine IDR 1,260,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

82. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Sekawan Jaya Bersama

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 29 August 2019 · case 23/KPPU-L/2018 · TENDER PRESERVASI DAN PELEBARAN JALAN BTS. PROVINSI ACEH - BARUS - SIBOLGA PADA SATKER PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL WILAYAH II PROVINSI SUMATERA UTARA APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2018 · fine IDR 1,000,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

83. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Fifo Pusaka Abadi

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 29 August 2019 · case 23/KPPU-L/2018 · TENDER PRESERVASI DAN PELEBARAN JALAN BTS. PROVINSI ACEH - BARUS - SIBOLGA PADA SATKER PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL WILAYAH II PROVINSI SUMATERA UTARA APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2018 · fine IDR 1,000,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

84. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Dewanto Cipta Pratama

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 29 August 2019 · case 14/KPPU-I/2018 · TENDER PAKET PRESERVASI REHABILITASI JALAN ZAENAL ARIFIN (STABAT) - BINJAI RAYA (MEDAN) - BELAWAN PADA SATUAN KERJA PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL METROPOLITAN MEDAN APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · fine IDR 1,769,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

85. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Bangun Mitra Abadi

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 29 August 2019 · case 14/KPPU-I/2018 · TENDER PAKET PRESERVASI REHABILITASI JALAN ZAENAL ARIFIN (STABAT) - BINJAI RAYA (MEDAN) - BELAWAN PADA SATUAN KERJA PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL METROPOLITAN MEDAN APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · fine IDR 1,769,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

86. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Kediri Putra

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 29 August 2019 · case 19/KPPU-I/2018 · PAKET PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN JALAN (KODE LELANG 770207) DAN PAKET PENINGKATAN JALAN (KODE LELANG 771207) OLEH DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM DAN PENATAAN RUANG KABUPATEN KEDIRI SUMBER DANA DAU APBD KABUPATEN KEDIRI TA 2017 · fine IDR 582,600,000,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years (Indonesia) · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

87. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Triple S Indosedulur

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 29 August 2019 · case 19/KPPU-I/2018 · PAKET PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN JALAN (KODE LELANG 770207) DAN PAKET PENINGKATAN JALAN (KODE LELANG 771207) OLEH DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM DAN PENATAAN RUANG KABUPATEN KEDIRI SUMBER DANA DAU APBD KABUPATEN KEDIRI TA 2017 · fine IDR 582,600,000,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years (Indonesia) · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

88. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Ayem Mulya Indah

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 29 August 2019 · case 19/KPPU-I/2018 · PAKET PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN JALAN (KODE LELANG 770207) DAN PAKET PENINGKATAN JALAN (KODE LELANG 771207) OLEH DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM DAN PENATAAN RUANG KABUPATEN KEDIRI SUMBER DANA DAU APBD KABUPATEN KEDIRI TA 2017 · fine IDR 194,200,000,000 · barred from tenders for 1 year (Indonesia) · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

89. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Jatisono Multi Konstruksi

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 29 August 2019 · case 19/KPPU-I/2018 · PAKET PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN JALAN (KODE LELANG 770207) DAN PAKET PENINGKATAN JALAN (KODE LELANG 771207) OLEH DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM DAN PENATAAN RUANG KABUPATEN KEDIRI SUMBER DANA DAU APBD KABUPATEN KEDIRI TA 2017 · fine IDR 194,200,000,000 · barred from tenders for 1 year (Indonesia) · respondent VI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

90. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Kediri Putra

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 29 August 2019 · case 20/KPPU-I/2018 · PELELANGAN PAKET PEKERJAAN PEMELIHARAAN BERKALA JALAN (KODE LELANG 902207) PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM DAN PENATAAN RUANG (PUPR) SUMBER DANA SPESIFIC GRANT/APBD KABUPATEN KEDIRI TA 2017 · fine IDR 3,700,000,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years (Indonesia) · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

91. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Ayem Mulya Aspalmix

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 29 August 2019 · case 20/KPPU-I/2018 · PELELANGAN PAKET PEKERJAAN PEMELIHARAAN BERKALA JALAN (KODE LELANG 902207) PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM DAN PENATAAN RUANG (PUPR) SUMBER DANA SPESIFIC GRANT/APBD KABUPATEN KEDIRI TA 2017 · fine IDR 1,000,000,000 · barred from tenders for 1 year (Indonesia) · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

92. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Ratna

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 29 August 2019 · case 20/KPPU-I/2018 · PELELANGAN PAKET PEKERJAAN PEMELIHARAAN BERKALA JALAN (KODE LELANG 902207) PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM DAN PENATAAN RUANG (PUPR) SUMBER DANA SPESIFIC GRANT/APBD KABUPATEN KEDIRI TA 2017 · fine IDR 1,000,000,000 · barred from tenders for 1 year (Indonesia) · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

93. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Galaxy Multi Tehnika

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 29 August 2019 · case 20/KPPU-I/2018 · PELELANGAN PAKET PEKERJAAN PEMELIHARAAN BERKALA JALAN (KODE LELANG 902207) PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM DAN PENATAAN RUANG (PUPR) SUMBER DANA SPESIFIC GRANT/APBD KABUPATEN KEDIRI TA 2017 · barred from tenders for 1 year (Indonesia) · respondent VI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

94. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Karya Agung Pratama Cipta

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 20 August 2019 · case 13/KPPU-L/2018 · PAKET PEMBANGUNAN JALAN BALIGE BY PASS PADA SATKER PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL WILAYAH I PROVINSI SUMATERA UTARA TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

95. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Swakarsa Tunggal Mandiri

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 20 August 2019 · case 13/KPPU-L/2018 · PAKET PEMBANGUNAN JALAN BALIGE BY PASS PADA SATKER PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL WILAYAH I PROVINSI SUMATERA UTARA TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · barred from tenders for 1 year (Indonesia) · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

96. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Anugrah Bahari Sejahtera Mandiri

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 20 August 2019 · case 13/KPPU-L/2018 · PAKET PEMBANGUNAN JALAN BALIGE BY PASS PADA SATKER PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL WILAYAH I PROVINSI SUMATERA UTARA TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · barred from tenders for 3 years (Indonesia) · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

97. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Jaya Wijaya Coperation

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 9 April 2019 · case 04/KPPU-L/2018 · LELANG PRESERVASI REKONSTRUKSI JALAN DAN PEMELIHARAAN RUTIN JEMBATAN PALANGKA RAYA-BAGUGUS-BUKIT BATU, KALIMANTAN TENGAH, SATKER PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL WILAYAH III, TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · fine IDR 1,709,446,598 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

98. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Margo Umega

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 9 April 2019 · case 04/KPPU-L/2018 · LELANG PRESERVASI REKONSTRUKSI JALAN DAN PEMELIHARAAN RUTIN JEMBATAN PALANGKA RAYA-BAGUGUS-BUKIT BATU, KALIMANTAN TENGAH, SATKER PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL WILAYAH III, TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · fine IDR 1,000,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

99. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

    PT Mellindo Bhakti Persadatama

    Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 9 April 2019 · case 05/KPPU-L/2018 · LELANG PRESERVASI REKONSTRUKSI JALAN DAN PEMELIHARAAN RUTIN JEMBATAN BUKIT BATU - LUNGKUH LAYANG - KALAHIEN, SATUAN KERJA PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL WILAYAH III, PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TENGAH, TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · fine IDR 1,034,999,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

100. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Jaya Wijaya Coperation

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 9 April 2019 · case 05/KPPU-L/2018 · LELANG PRESERVASI REKONSTRUKSI JALAN DAN PEMELIHARAAN RUTIN JEMBATAN BUKIT BATU - LUNGKUH LAYANG - KALAHIEN, SATUAN KERJA PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL WILAYAH III, PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TENGAH, TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · fine IDR 1,086,749,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

101. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Mellindo Bhakti Persadatama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 9 April 2019 · case 06/KPPU-L/2018 · PAKET LELANG PRESERVASI REKONSTRUKSI JALAN DAN PEMELIHARAAN RUTIN JEMBATAN KALAHIEN - BUNTOK - AMPAH DI LINGKUNGAN POKJA SATKER PELAKSANA JALAN NASIONAL WILAYAH III PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TENGAH TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · fine IDR 1,152,144,270 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

102. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Jaya Wijaya Coperation

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 9 April 2019 · case 06/KPPU-L/2018 · PAKET LELANG PRESERVASI REKONSTRUKSI JALAN DAN PEMELIHARAAN RUTIN JEMBATAN KALAHIEN - BUNTOK - AMPAH DI LINGKUNGAN POKJA SATKER PELAKSANA JALAN NASIONAL WILAYAH III PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TENGAH TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

103. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Margo Umega

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 9 April 2019 · case 06/KPPU-L/2018 · PAKET LELANG PRESERVASI REKONSTRUKSI JALAN DAN PEMELIHARAAN RUTIN JEMBATAN KALAHIEN - BUNTOK - AMPAH DI LINGKUNGAN POKJA SATKER PELAKSANA JALAN NASIONAL WILAYAH III PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TENGAH TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

104. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Surya Mandiri Perdana

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 1 February 2019 · case 11/KPPU-I/2017 · PRESERVASI REKONSTRUKSI ESANG-RAINIS-MELONGUANE-BEO PADA SATUAN KERJA PELAKSANA JALAN NASIONAL WILAYAH III SULAWESI UTARA (SANGIHE TALAUD) TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · fine IDR 3,665,873,880 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

105. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Mandiri Bhakti Majene

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 1 February 2019 · case 11/KPPU-I/2017 · PRESERVASI REKONSTRUKSI ESANG-RAINIS-MELONGUANE-BEO PADA SATUAN KERJA PELAKSANA JALAN NASIONAL WILAYAH III SULAWESI UTARA (SANGIHE TALAUD) TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · fine IDR 1,000,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

106. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Mellindo Bhakti Persadatama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 10 January 2019 · case 03/KPPU-L/2018 · TENDER PAKET PRESERVASI REKONSTRUKSI JALAN DAN PEMELIHARAAN RUTIN JEMBATAN SIMPANG SEI ASAM - TARAKAS - TUMBANG TALAKEN PADA SATUAN TUGAS KERJA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TENGAH TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · fine IDR 1,565,000,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years (Indonesia) · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

107. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Jaya Wijaya Coperation

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 10 January 2019 · case 03/KPPU-L/2018 · TENDER PAKET PRESERVASI REKONSTRUKSI JALAN DAN PEMELIHARAAN RUTIN JEMBATAN SIMPANG SEI ASAM - TARAKAS - TUMBANG TALAKEN PADA SATUAN TUGAS KERJA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TENGAH TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · fine IDR 1,000,000,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years (Indonesia) · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

108. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Margo Umega

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 10 January 2019 · case 03/KPPU-L/2018 · TENDER PAKET PRESERVASI REKONSTRUKSI JALAN DAN PEMELIHARAAN RUTIN JEMBATAN SIMPANG SEI ASAM - TARAKAS - TUMBANG TALAKEN PADA SATUAN TUGAS KERJA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TENGAH TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 · fine IDR 1,000,000,000 · barred from tenders for 1 year (Indonesia) · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

109. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Duta Mas Indah

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 18 December 2018 · case 10/KPPU-I/2017 · PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN STADION MANDALA KRIDA APBD TAHUN ANGGARAN 2016 DAN PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN STADION MANDALA KRIDA APBDP TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 PROVINSI DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA · fine IDR 2,509,000,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years (Indonesia) · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

110. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Eka Madra Sentosa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 18 December 2018 · case 10/KPPU-I/2017 · PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN STADION MANDALA KRIDA APBD TAHUN ANGGARAN 2016 DAN PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN STADION MANDALA KRIDA APBDP TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 PROVINSI DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA · fine IDR 1,000,000,000 · respondent IX of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

111. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Kenanga Mulya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 18 December 2018 · case 10/KPPU-I/2017 · PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN STADION MANDALA KRIDA APBD TAHUN ANGGARAN 2016 DAN PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN STADION MANDALA KRIDA APBDP TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 PROVINSI DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA · fine IDR 1,000,000,000 · barred from tenders for 1 year (Indonesia) · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

112. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Lima Tujuh Tujuh

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 18 December 2018 · case 10/KPPU-I/2017 · PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN STADION MANDALA KRIDA APBD TAHUN ANGGARAN 2016 DAN PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN STADION MANDALA KRIDA APBDP TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 PROVINSI DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA · fine IDR 1,000,000,000 · barred from tenders for 1 year (Indonesia) · respondent VI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

113. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Bimapatria Pradanaraya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 18 December 2018 · case 10/KPPU-I/2017 · PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN STADION MANDALA KRIDA APBD TAHUN ANGGARAN 2016 DAN PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN STADION MANDALA KRIDA APBDP TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 PROVINSI DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA · fine IDR 1,070,000,000 · barred from tenders for 1 year (Indonesia) · respondent VII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

114. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Permata Nirwana Nusantara

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 18 December 2018 · case 10/KPPU-I/2017 · PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN STADION MANDALA KRIDA APBD TAHUN ANGGARAN 2016 DAN PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN STADION MANDALA KRIDA APBDP TAHUN ANGGARAN 2017 PROVINSI DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA · fine IDR 1,322,000,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years (Indonesia) · respondent VIII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

115. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PC Muriah Ltd

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 11 October 2018 · case 04/KPPU-L/2017 · TENDER PROVISION OF UNDER WATER SERVICES FOR KEPODANG AND KETAPANG FIELD (TENDER NO. 11204) · fine IDR 1,243,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

116. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PC Ketapang II Ltd

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 11 October 2018 · case 04/KPPU-L/2017 · TENDER PROVISION OF UNDER WATER SERVICES FOR KEPODANG AND KETAPANG FIELD (TENDER NO. 11204) · fine IDR 1,243,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

117. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Aquamarine Divindo Inspection

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 11 October 2018 · case 04/KPPU-L/2017 · TENDER PROVISION OF UNDER WATER SERVICES FOR KEPODANG AND KETAPANG FIELD (TENDER NO. 11204) · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

118. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Gayotama Leopropita

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 September 2018 · case 01/KPPU-L/2017 · TENDER PAKET PEKERJAANPENINGKATAN KAPASITAS/PELEBARAN JALAN KABANJAHE-KUTABULUH TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013-2014 (MULTIYEARS) DAN PAKET TENDER PEKERJAAN PELEBARAN JALAN BTS. KABANJAHE-KUTABULU TAHUN 2015 PADA SATUAN KERJA PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL WILAYAH I PROVINSI SUMATERA UTARA · fine IDR 1,518,600,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

119. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Multhi Bangun Cipta Persada

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 September 2018 · case 01/KPPU-L/2017 · TENDER PAKET PEKERJAANPENINGKATAN KAPASITAS/PELEBARAN JALAN KABANJAHE-KUTABULUH TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013-2014 (MULTIYEARS) DAN PAKET TENDER PEKERJAAN PELEBARAN JALAN BTS. KABANJAHE-KUTABULU TAHUN 2015 PADA SATUAN KERJA PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL WILAYAH I PROVINSI SUMATERA UTARA · fine IDR 1,712,700,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years (Indonesia) · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

120. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Matahari Abdya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 September 2018 · case 01/KPPU-L/2017 · TENDER PAKET PEKERJAANPENINGKATAN KAPASITAS/PELEBARAN JALAN KABANJAHE-KUTABULUH TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013-2014 (MULTIYEARS) DAN PAKET TENDER PEKERJAAN PELEBARAN JALAN BTS. KABANJAHE-KUTABULU TAHUN 2015 PADA SATUAN KERJA PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL WILAYAH I PROVINSI SUMATERA UTARA · fine IDR 1,106,600,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years (Indonesia) · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

121. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Surya Gemilang Indah

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 30 January 2018 · case 21/KPPU-I/2016 · DUGAAN PELANGGARAN PASAL 22 UNDANG - UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1999 TERKAIT PAKET PEKERJAAN PENINGKATAN JALAN LUBUK JAMBI-SP.IBUL-SP.IFA DI KABUPATEN KUANTAN SINGINGI-PROVINSI RIAU PADA DINAS BINA MARGA PROVINSI RIAU TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015 · fine IDR 2,062,800,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

122. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Berkat Yakin Gemilang

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 30 January 2018 · case 21/KPPU-I/2016 · DUGAAN PELANGGARAN PASAL 22 UNDANG - UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1999 TERKAIT PAKET PEKERJAAN PENINGKATAN JALAN LUBUK JAMBI-SP.IBUL-SP.IFA DI KABUPATEN KUANTAN SINGINGI-PROVINSI RIAU PADA DINAS BINA MARGA PROVINSI RIAU TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015 · fine IDR 515,700,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

123. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Karya Dharma Jambi Persada

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 14 November 2017 · case 18/KPPU-I/2016 · PAKET PEKERJAAN PRESERVASI DAN PELEBARAN BTS. PROVINSI RIAU-MERLUNG-SP. NIAM APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2016 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

124. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Hanro

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 14 November 2017 · case 18/KPPU-I/2016 · PAKET PEKERJAAN PRESERVASI DAN PELEBARAN BTS. PROVINSI RIAU-MERLUNG-SP. NIAM APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2016 · fine IDR 588,400,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

125. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Bina Uli

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 14 November 2017 · case 18/KPPU-I/2016 · PAKET PEKERJAAN PRESERVASI DAN PELEBARAN BTS. PROVINSI RIAU-MERLUNG-SP. NIAM APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2016 · fine IDR 588,400,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

126. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Hanro

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 14 November 2017 · case 19/KPPU-I/2016 · PAKET PEKERJAAN PRESERVASI DAN PELEBARAN JALAN ARAH MUARA TEBO/PATTIMURA (MUARA BUNGO) – SEI. BENGKAL · fine IDR 1,957,486,847 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

127. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Karya Dharma Jambi Persada

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 14 November 2017 · case 19/KPPU-I/2016 · PAKET PEKERJAAN PRESERVASI DAN PELEBARAN JALAN ARAH MUARA TEBO/PATTIMURA (MUARA BUNGO) – SEI. BENGKAL · fine IDR 978,743,424 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

128. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Bina Uli

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 14 November 2017 · case 19/KPPU-I/2016 · PAKET PEKERJAAN PRESERVASI DAN PELEBARAN JALAN ARAH MUARA TEBO/PATTIMURA (MUARA BUNGO) – SEI. BENGKAL · fine IDR 978,743,424 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

129. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Nike Jaya Abadi

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 October 2017 · case 16/KPPU-I/2016 · BERKAITAN DENGAN PAKET PENGADAAN PEMBANGUNAN SARANA DAN PRASARANA PENDIDIKAN UNIT PELAKSANA TEKNIS DAERAH (UPTD) SEKOLAH KHUSUS OLAHRAGAWAN INTERNASIONAL (SKOI) PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TIMUR, TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 444,175,200 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

130. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Yulia Jaya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 October 2017 · case 16/KPPU-I/2016 · BERKAITAN DENGAN PAKET PENGADAAN PEMBANGUNAN SARANA DAN PRASARANA PENDIDIKAN UNIT PELAKSANA TEKNIS DAERAH (UPTD) SEKOLAH KHUSUS OLAHRAGAWAN INTERNASIONAL (SKOI) PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TIMUR, TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 190,360,800 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

131. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Karyatama Nagasari

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 29 August 2017 · case 17/KPPU-I/2016 · PENINGKATAN JALAN JONGKANG MENUJU JALAN JAKARTA SAMARINDA KARANG PACI (RING ROAD III) KECAMATAN TENGGARONG SEBERANG · fine IDR 502,102,800,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years (Indonesia) · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

132. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Jasin Effrin Jaya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 29 August 2017 · case 17/KPPU-I/2016 · PENINGKATAN JALAN JONGKANG MENUJU JALAN JAKARTA SAMARINDA KARANG PACI (RING ROAD III) KECAMATAN TENGGARONG SEBERANG · fine IDR 502,102,800,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years (Indonesia) · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

133. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Karya Mandiri Jaya Pratama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 22 August 2017 · case 14/KPPU-L/2016 · PEMBANGUNAN (PENGEMBANGAN) FASILITAS PELABUHAN LAUT BENTENG KABUPATEN SELAYAR APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015 DAN PEMBANGUNAN PENGEMBANGAN) FASILITAS PELABUHAN LAUT BENTENG KABUPATEN SELAYAR APBN-P TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015 · fine IDR 1,842,659,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

134. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Nokilalaki Sembada

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 22 August 2017 · case 14/KPPU-L/2016 · PEMBANGUNAN (PENGEMBANGAN) FASILITAS PELABUHAN LAUT BENTENG KABUPATEN SELAYAR APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015 DAN PEMBANGUNAN PENGEMBANGAN) FASILITAS PELABUHAN LAUT BENTENG KABUPATEN SELAYAR APBN-P TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015 · fine IDR 1,000,000,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent VII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

135. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Cahya Mentari Cemerlang

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 22 August 2017 · case 14/KPPU-L/2016 · PEMBANGUNAN (PENGEMBANGAN) FASILITAS PELABUHAN LAUT BENTENG KABUPATEN SELAYAR APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015 DAN PEMBANGUNAN PENGEMBANGAN) FASILITAS PELABUHAN LAUT BENTENG KABUPATEN SELAYAR APBN-P TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015 · fine IDR 1,000,000,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent VIII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

136. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Ligas Cipta Mulia

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 1 August 2017 · case 15/KPPU-I/2016 · PAKET PELELANGAN PROYEK PENINGKATAN STRUKTUR JALAN PUTUSSIBAU-NANGA ERA, PENINGKATAN STRUKTUR JALAN PUTUSSIBAU-NANGA ERA-BTS.KALTIM, PROYEK PELEBARAN JALAN NANGA SEMANGUT-BTS.KOTA PUTUSSIBAU-TANJUNG KERJA DAN PROYEK PELEBARAN JALAN NANGA SEMANGUT-PUTUSSIBAU KALIMANTAN BARAT · fine IDR 4,084,800,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

137. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Rajawali Sakti Kalbar

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 1 August 2017 · case 15/KPPU-I/2016 · PAKET PELELANGAN PROYEK PENINGKATAN STRUKTUR JALAN PUTUSSIBAU-NANGA ERA, PENINGKATAN STRUKTUR JALAN PUTUSSIBAU-NANGA ERA-BTS.KALTIM, PROYEK PELEBARAN JALAN NANGA SEMANGUT-BTS.KOTA PUTUSSIBAU-TANJUNG KERJA DAN PROYEK PELEBARAN JALAN NANGA SEMANGUT-PUTUSSIBAU KALIMANTAN BARAT · fine IDR 2,245,800,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

138. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Semesta Tunggal Perkasa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 1 August 2017 · case 15/KPPU-I/2016 · PAKET PELELANGAN PROYEK PENINGKATAN STRUKTUR JALAN PUTUSSIBAU-NANGA ERA, PENINGKATAN STRUKTUR JALAN PUTUSSIBAU-NANGA ERA-BTS.KALTIM, PROYEK PELEBARAN JALAN NANGA SEMANGUT-BTS.KOTA PUTUSSIBAU-TANJUNG KERJA DAN PROYEK PELEBARAN JALAN NANGA SEMANGUT-PUTUSSIBAU KALIMANTAN BARAT · fine IDR 1,223,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

139. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Lintas Kapuas Persada

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 1 August 2017 · case 15/KPPU-I/2016 · PAKET PELELANGAN PROYEK PENINGKATAN STRUKTUR JALAN PUTUSSIBAU-NANGA ERA, PENINGKATAN STRUKTUR JALAN PUTUSSIBAU-NANGA ERA-BTS.KALTIM, PROYEK PELEBARAN JALAN NANGA SEMANGUT-BTS.KOTA PUTUSSIBAU-TANJUNG KERJA DAN PROYEK PELEBARAN JALAN NANGA SEMANGUT-PUTUSSIBAU KALIMANTAN BARAT · fine IDR 116,400,000 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

140. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Selaras Usaha Bersama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 1 August 2017 · case 15/KPPU-I/2016 · PAKET PELELANGAN PROYEK PENINGKATAN STRUKTUR JALAN PUTUSSIBAU-NANGA ERA, PENINGKATAN STRUKTUR JALAN PUTUSSIBAU-NANGA ERA-BTS.KALTIM, PROYEK PELEBARAN JALAN NANGA SEMANGUT-BTS.KOTA PUTUSSIBAU-TANJUNG KERJA DAN PROYEK PELEBARAN JALAN NANGA SEMANGUT-PUTUSSIBAU KALIMANTAN BARAT · fine IDR 91,900,000 · respondent IX of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

141. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Mandiri Kita Perkasa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 1 August 2017 · case 15/KPPU-I/2016 · PAKET PELELANGAN PROYEK PENINGKATAN STRUKTUR JALAN PUTUSSIBAU-NANGA ERA, PENINGKATAN STRUKTUR JALAN PUTUSSIBAU-NANGA ERA-BTS.KALTIM, PROYEK PELEBARAN JALAN NANGA SEMANGUT-BTS.KOTA PUTUSSIBAU-TANJUNG KERJA DAN PROYEK PELEBARAN JALAN NANGA SEMANGUT-PUTUSSIBAU KALIMANTAN BARAT · fine IDR 110,600,000 · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

142. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Ariaputra Dwi Prima

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 1 August 2017 · case 15/KPPU-I/2016 · PAKET PELELANGAN PROYEK PENINGKATAN STRUKTUR JALAN PUTUSSIBAU-NANGA ERA, PENINGKATAN STRUKTUR JALAN PUTUSSIBAU-NANGA ERA-BTS.KALTIM, PROYEK PELEBARAN JALAN NANGA SEMANGUT-BTS.KOTA PUTUSSIBAU-TANJUNG KERJA DAN PROYEK PELEBARAN JALAN NANGA SEMANGUT-PUTUSSIBAU KALIMANTAN BARAT · fine IDR 202,500,000 · respondent VI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

143. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Arung Benua Nusantara

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 1 August 2017 · case 15/KPPU-I/2016 · PAKET PELELANGAN PROYEK PENINGKATAN STRUKTUR JALAN PUTUSSIBAU-NANGA ERA, PENINGKATAN STRUKTUR JALAN PUTUSSIBAU-NANGA ERA-BTS.KALTIM, PROYEK PELEBARAN JALAN NANGA SEMANGUT-BTS.KOTA PUTUSSIBAU-TANJUNG KERJA DAN PROYEK PELEBARAN JALAN NANGA SEMANGUT-PUTUSSIBAU KALIMANTAN BARAT · fine IDR 2,071,800,000 · respondent VII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

144. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Synergy Dua Kawan Sejati

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 18 July 2017 · case 24/KPPU-I/2016 · 4 (EMPAT) PAKET PENGADAAN ALAT KEDOKTERAN DI RSUD ABDUL WAHAB SJAHRANIE SAMARINDA, KALIMANTAN TIMUR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2012 DAN 2013 · fine IDR 2,050,400,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

145. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Kembang Turi Healthcare

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 18 July 2017 · case 24/KPPU-I/2016 · 4 (EMPAT) PAKET PENGADAAN ALAT KEDOKTERAN DI RSUD ABDUL WAHAB SJAHRANIE SAMARINDA, KALIMANTAN TIMUR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2012 DAN 2013 · fine IDR 233,300,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

146. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Dwi Putra Unggul Pratama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 18 July 2017 · case 24/KPPU-I/2016 · 4 (EMPAT) PAKET PENGADAAN ALAT KEDOKTERAN DI RSUD ABDUL WAHAB SJAHRANIE SAMARINDA, KALIMANTAN TIMUR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2012 DAN 2013 · fine IDR 275,100,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

147. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV Trimanunggal Mandiri

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 18 July 2017 · case 24/KPPU-I/2016 · 4 (EMPAT) PAKET PENGADAAN ALAT KEDOKTERAN DI RSUD ABDUL WAHAB SJAHRANIE SAMARINDA, KALIMANTAN TIMUR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2012 DAN 2013 · fine IDR 41,800,000 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

148. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV Tiga Utama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 18 July 2017 · case 24/KPPU-I/2016 · 4 (EMPAT) PAKET PENGADAAN ALAT KEDOKTERAN DI RSUD ABDUL WAHAB SJAHRANIE SAMARINDA, KALIMANTAN TIMUR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2012 DAN 2013 · fine IDR 152,100,000 · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

149. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Kharisma Bina Konstruksi

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 21 March 2017 · case 06/KPPU-L/2016 · PAKET PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN BENDUNG DI SIDILANITANO 2420 HA KABUPATEN TAPANULI UTARA DAN PAKET PEKERJAAN BENDUNG DI SITAKKURAK 1000 HA KABUPATEN TAPANULI TENGAH TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015-2017 (MULTIYEARS) · fine IDR 3,335,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

150. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Hariara

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 21 March 2017 · case 06/KPPU-L/2016 · PAKET PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN BENDUNG DI SIDILANITANO 2420 HA KABUPATEN TAPANULI UTARA DAN PAKET PEKERJAAN BENDUNG DI SITAKKURAK 1000 HA KABUPATEN TAPANULI TENGAH TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015-2017 (MULTIYEARS) · fine IDR 4,711,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

151. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Rudy Jaya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 21 March 2017 · case 06/KPPU-L/2016 · PAKET PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN BENDUNG DI SIDILANITANO 2420 HA KABUPATEN TAPANULI UTARA DAN PAKET PEKERJAAN BENDUNG DI SITAKKURAK 1000 HA KABUPATEN TAPANULI TENGAH TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015-2017 (MULTIYEARS) · fine IDR 893,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

152. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Sumber Energi Sumatera

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 27 February 2017 · case 05/KPPU-L/2016 · 4 (EMPAT) PAKET PEMBORONGAN PEKERJAAN PELAYANAN TEKNIK PADA PLN (PERSERO) AREA RANTAU PRAPAT TAHUN 2015-2020 · fine IDR 1,239,204,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

153. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Mustika Asahan Jaya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 27 February 2017 · case 05/KPPU-L/2016 · 4 (EMPAT) PAKET PEMBORONGAN PEKERJAAN PELAYANAN TEKNIK PADA PLN (PERSERO) AREA RANTAU PRAPAT TAHUN 2015-2020 · fine IDR 1,239,204,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

154. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV. Nira Manis

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 21 February 2017 · case 07/KPPU-L/2016 · PENGADAAN PUPUK INTENSIFIKASI TANAMAN KAKAO DI DINAS PERKEBUNAN PROVINSI SULAWESI SELATAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015 · fine IDR 1,939,355,520 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

155. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Imsiar

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 21 February 2017 · case 07/KPPU-L/2016 · PENGADAAN PUPUK INTENSIFIKASI TANAMAN KAKAO DI DINAS PERKEBUNAN PROVINSI SULAWESI SELATAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015 · fine IDR 645,227,520 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

156. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV Lima Bintang Persada

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 21 February 2017 · case 07/KPPU-L/2016 · PENGADAAN PUPUK INTENSIFIKASI TANAMAN KAKAO DI DINAS PERKEBUNAN PROVINSI SULAWESI SELATAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015 · fine IDR 646,177,920 · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

157. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Cahaya Abadi Global

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 21 February 2017 · case 07/KPPU-L/2016 · PENGADAAN PUPUK INTENSIFIKASI TANAMAN KAKAO DI DINAS PERKEBUNAN PROVINSI SULAWESI SELATAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015 · fine IDR 651,563,520 · respondent VI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

158. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Istana Bunga Baru

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 21 February 2017 · case 07/KPPU-L/2016 · PENGADAAN PUPUK INTENSIFIKASI TANAMAN KAKAO DI DINAS PERKEBUNAN PROVINSI SULAWESI SELATAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015 · respondent VII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

159. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Pilar Nusba Alam Jaya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 21 February 2017 · case 07/KPPU-L/2016 · PENGADAAN PUPUK INTENSIFIKASI TANAMAN KAKAO DI DINAS PERKEBUNAN PROVINSI SULAWESI SELATAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015 · fine IDR 2,590,379,520 · respondent VIII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

160. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     Husky – CNOOC Madura Limited

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 25 October 2016 · case 03/KPPU-L/2016 · TENDER/LELANG JACK-UP DRILLING RIG SERVICES FOR BD (NOMOR: PT 2140720/PT 2140720R) · fine IDR 11,600,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

161. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT COSL INDO

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 25 October 2016 · case 03/KPPU-L/2016 · TENDER/LELANG JACK-UP DRILLING RIG SERVICES FOR BD (NOMOR: PT 2140720/PT 2140720R) · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

162. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Duta Utama Sumatera

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 October 2016 · case 18/KPPU-L/2015 · PROSES PELELANGAN PEKERJAAN LANJUTAN PEMBANGUNAN KONSTRUKSI GEDUNG KANTOR BUPATI LABUHANBATU SELATAN (CARPORT DAN GEDUNG BAGIAN UTARA) DAN LANJUTAN PEMBANGUNAN KONSTRUKSI GEDUNG KANTOR BUPATI LABUHANBATU SELATAN (GEDUNG AULA DAN GEDUNG BAGIAN SELATAN) TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 SERTA PEMBANGUNAN KONSTRUKSI GEDUNG BAGIAN UTARA KANTOR BUPATI LABUHANBATU SELATAN (TAHAP II) DAN PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN KONSTRUKSI GEDUNG BAGIAN SELATAN · fine IDR 2,133,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

163. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Raja Oloan

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 October 2016 · case 18/KPPU-L/2015 · PROSES PELELANGAN PEKERJAAN LANJUTAN PEMBANGUNAN KONSTRUKSI GEDUNG KANTOR BUPATI LABUHANBATU SELATAN (CARPORT DAN GEDUNG BAGIAN UTARA) DAN LANJUTAN PEMBANGUNAN KONSTRUKSI GEDUNG KANTOR BUPATI LABUHANBATU SELATAN (GEDUNG AULA DAN GEDUNG BAGIAN SELATAN) TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 SERTA PEMBANGUNAN KONSTRUKSI GEDUNG BAGIAN UTARA KANTOR BUPATI LABUHANBATU SELATAN (TAHAP II) DAN PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN KONSTRUKSI GEDUNG BAGIAN SELATAN · fine IDR 511,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

164. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Multi Raya Arttech

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 October 2016 · case 18/KPPU-L/2015 · PROSES PELELANGAN PEKERJAAN LANJUTAN PEMBANGUNAN KONSTRUKSI GEDUNG KANTOR BUPATI LABUHANBATU SELATAN (CARPORT DAN GEDUNG BAGIAN UTARA) DAN LANJUTAN PEMBANGUNAN KONSTRUKSI GEDUNG KANTOR BUPATI LABUHANBATU SELATAN (GEDUNG AULA DAN GEDUNG BAGIAN SELATAN) TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 SERTA PEMBANGUNAN KONSTRUKSI GEDUNG BAGIAN UTARA KANTOR BUPATI LABUHANBATU SELATAN (TAHAP II) DAN PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN KONSTRUKSI GEDUNG BAGIAN SELATAN · fine IDR 761,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

165. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Duta Agung Group

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 October 2016 · case 18/KPPU-L/2015 · PROSES PELELANGAN PEKERJAAN LANJUTAN PEMBANGUNAN KONSTRUKSI GEDUNG KANTOR BUPATI LABUHANBATU SELATAN (CARPORT DAN GEDUNG BAGIAN UTARA) DAN LANJUTAN PEMBANGUNAN KONSTRUKSI GEDUNG KANTOR BUPATI LABUHANBATU SELATAN (GEDUNG AULA DAN GEDUNG BAGIAN SELATAN) TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 SERTA PEMBANGUNAN KONSTRUKSI GEDUNG BAGIAN UTARA KANTOR BUPATI LABUHANBATU SELATAN (TAHAP II) DAN PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN KONSTRUKSI GEDUNG BAGIAN SELATAN · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

166. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Karya Agung Pratama Cipta

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 October 2016 · case 18/KPPU-L/2015 · PROSES PELELANGAN PEKERJAAN LANJUTAN PEMBANGUNAN KONSTRUKSI GEDUNG KANTOR BUPATI LABUHANBATU SELATAN (CARPORT DAN GEDUNG BAGIAN UTARA) DAN LANJUTAN PEMBANGUNAN KONSTRUKSI GEDUNG KANTOR BUPATI LABUHANBATU SELATAN (GEDUNG AULA DAN GEDUNG BAGIAN SELATAN) TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 SERTA PEMBANGUNAN KONSTRUKSI GEDUNG BAGIAN UTARA KANTOR BUPATI LABUHANBATU SELATAN (TAHAP II) DAN PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN KONSTRUKSI GEDUNG BAGIAN SELATAN · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

167. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Mulia Perkasa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 October 2016 · case 18/KPPU-L/2015 · PROSES PELELANGAN PEKERJAAN LANJUTAN PEMBANGUNAN KONSTRUKSI GEDUNG KANTOR BUPATI LABUHANBATU SELATAN (CARPORT DAN GEDUNG BAGIAN UTARA) DAN LANJUTAN PEMBANGUNAN KONSTRUKSI GEDUNG KANTOR BUPATI LABUHANBATU SELATAN (GEDUNG AULA DAN GEDUNG BAGIAN SELATAN) TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 SERTA PEMBANGUNAN KONSTRUKSI GEDUNG BAGIAN UTARA KANTOR BUPATI LABUHANBATU SELATAN (TAHAP II) DAN PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN KONSTRUKSI GEDUNG BAGIAN SELATAN · respondent VI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

168. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Tisa Lestari

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 October 2016 · case 18/KPPU-L/2015 · PROSES PELELANGAN PEKERJAAN LANJUTAN PEMBANGUNAN KONSTRUKSI GEDUNG KANTOR BUPATI LABUHANBATU SELATAN (CARPORT DAN GEDUNG BAGIAN UTARA) DAN LANJUTAN PEMBANGUNAN KONSTRUKSI GEDUNG KANTOR BUPATI LABUHANBATU SELATAN (GEDUNG AULA DAN GEDUNG BAGIAN SELATAN) TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 SERTA PEMBANGUNAN KONSTRUKSI GEDUNG BAGIAN UTARA KANTOR BUPATI LABUHANBATU SELATAN (TAHAP II) DAN PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN KONSTRUKSI GEDUNG BAGIAN SELATAN · respondent VII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

169. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Perdana Dinamika Persada

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 September 2016 · case 22/KPPU-I/2015 · PELELANGAN PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN PERIKANAN GUGOP-LAMPUYANG (LANJUTAN) PADA SATKER BADAN PENGUSAHAAN KAWASAN PERDAGANGAN BEBAS DAN PELABUHAN BEBAS (BPKS) SABANG TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 · fine IDR 1,105,616,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

170. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Lince Romauli Raya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 September 2016 · case 22/KPPU-I/2015 · PELELANGAN PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN PERIKANAN GUGOP-LAMPUYANG (LANJUTAN) PADA SATKER BADAN PENGUSAHAAN KAWASAN PERDAGANGAN BEBAS DAN PELABUHAN BEBAS (BPKS) SABANG TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 · fine IDR 1,005,105,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

171. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Tenaga Inti Makmu Beusare

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 September 2016 · case 22/KPPU-I/2015 · PELELANGAN PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN PERIKANAN GUGOP-LAMPUYANG (LANJUTAN) PADA SATKER BADAN PENGUSAHAAN KAWASAN PERDAGANGAN BEBAS DAN PELABUHAN BEBAS (BPKS) SABANG TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 · fine IDR 804,084,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

172. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Alam Baru Jaya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 September 2016 · case 22/KPPU-I/2015 · PELELANGAN PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN PERIKANAN GUGOP-LAMPUYANG (LANJUTAN) PADA SATKER BADAN PENGUSAHAAN KAWASAN PERDAGANGAN BEBAS DAN PELABUHAN BEBAS (BPKS) SABANG TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

173. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Permatanusa Setiahati

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 September 2016 · case 22/KPPU-I/2015 · PELELANGAN PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN PERIKANAN GUGOP-LAMPUYANG (LANJUTAN) PADA SATKER BADAN PENGUSAHAAN KAWASAN PERDAGANGAN BEBAS DAN PELABUHAN BEBAS (BPKS) SABANG TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

174. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Timur Utama Sakti

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 20 September 2016 · case 19/KPPU-I/2015 · PELELANGAN REHABILITASI/PEMELIHARAAN JALAN (APBD II) OLEH SATUAN KERJA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KOTA MAKASSAR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 · fine IDR 1,472,514,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

175. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Tompo Dalle

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 20 September 2016 · case 19/KPPU-I/2015 · PELELANGAN REHABILITASI/PEMELIHARAAN JALAN (APBD II) OLEH SATUAN KERJA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KOTA MAKASSAR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 · fine IDR 1,099,812,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

176. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Citratama Timurindo

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 20 September 2016 · case 19/KPPU-I/2015 · PELELANGAN REHABILITASI/PEMELIHARAAN JALAN (APBD II) OLEH SATUAN KERJA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KOTA MAKASSAR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 · fine IDR 426,602,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

177. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Win Wahana Cipta Marga

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 20 September 2016 · case 19/KPPU-I/2015 · PELELANGAN REHABILITASI/PEMELIHARAAN JALAN (APBD II) OLEH SATUAN KERJA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KOTA MAKASSAR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 · fine IDR 1,208,483,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent VI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

178. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Mulia Trans Marga

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 20 September 2016 · case 19/KPPU-I/2015 · PELELANGAN REHABILITASI/PEMELIHARAAN JALAN (APBD II) OLEH SATUAN KERJA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KOTA MAKASSAR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 · fine IDR 212,746,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent VII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

179. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Gangking Raya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 20 September 2016 · case 19/KPPU-I/2015 · PELELANGAN REHABILITASI/PEMELIHARAAN JALAN (APBD II) OLEH SATUAN KERJA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KOTA MAKASSAR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 · fine IDR 540,562,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent VIII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

180. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Aset Prima Tama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 13 September 2016 · case 01/KPPU-L/2016 · PEKERJAAN PENINGKATAN JALAN PESUT PADA SATUAN KERJA DINAS BINA MARGA DAN SUMBER DAYA AIR KABUPATEN KUTAI KARTANEGARA TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015 · fine IDR 1,927,965,395 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

181. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Budi Bakti Prima

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 13 September 2016 · case 01/KPPU-L/2016 · PEKERJAAN PENINGKATAN JALAN PESUT PADA SATUAN KERJA DINAS BINA MARGA DAN SUMBER DAYA AIR KABUPATEN KUTAI KARTANEGARA TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015 · fine IDR 942,560,860 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

182. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Bangun Cipta Kontraktor

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 13 September 2016 · case 01/KPPU-L/2016 · PEKERJAAN PENINGKATAN JALAN PESUT PADA SATUAN KERJA DINAS BINA MARGA DAN SUMBER DAYA AIR KABUPATEN KUTAI KARTANEGARA TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015 · fine IDR 385,593,079 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

183. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Karunia Wahananusa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 13 September 2016 · case 01/KPPU-L/2016 · PEKERJAAN PENINGKATAN JALAN PESUT PADA SATUAN KERJA DINAS BINA MARGA DAN SUMBER DAYA AIR KABUPATEN KUTAI KARTANEGARA TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015 · fine IDR 942,560,860 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

184. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Lombok Infrastruktur Perkasa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 30 August 2016 · case 20/KPPU-L/2015 · BERKAITAN DENGAN TENDER PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA KONSTRUKSI DI LINGKUNGAN SATUAN KERJA PELAKSANA JALAN NASIONAL WILAYAH I PROVINSI NUSA TENGGARA BARAT TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015 · fine IDR 9,056,479,194 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

185. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Bunga Raya Lestari

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 30 August 2016 · case 20/KPPU-L/2015 · BERKAITAN DENGAN TENDER PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA KONSTRUKSI DI LINGKUNGAN SATUAN KERJA PELAKSANA JALAN NASIONAL WILAYAH I PROVINSI NUSA TENGGARA BARAT TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015 · fine IDR 3,027,656,394 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

186. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Aria Jaya Raya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 30 August 2016 · case 20/KPPU-L/2015 · BERKAITAN DENGAN TENDER PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA KONSTRUKSI DI LINGKUNGAN SATUAN KERJA PELAKSANA JALAN NASIONAL WILAYAH I PROVINSI NUSA TENGGARA BARAT TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015 · fine IDR 2,029,778,604 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

187. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Sarana Dwi Makmur

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 7 August 2016 · case 15/KPPU-L/2015 · 5 (LIMA) PAKET TENDER PENERANGAN JALAN UMUM (PJU) SIDOARJO, TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 DAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015 · fine IDR 4,752,570,123 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

188. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Pelita Bumiwangi

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 7 August 2016 · case 15/KPPU-L/2015 · 5 (LIMA) PAKET TENDER PENERANGAN JALAN UMUM (PJU) SIDOARJO, TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 DAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015 · fine IDR 370,611,318 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

189. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Hasta Karya Perdana

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 7 August 2016 · case 15/KPPU-L/2015 · 5 (LIMA) PAKET TENDER PENERANGAN JALAN UMUM (PJU) SIDOARJO, TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 DAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015 · fine IDR 137,564,655 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

190. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Jasmanie Elektrindo Perkasa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 7 August 2016 · case 15/KPPU-L/2015 · 5 (LIMA) PAKET TENDER PENERANGAN JALAN UMUM (PJU) SIDOARJO, TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 DAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015 · fine IDR 357,573,682 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

191. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Syam Putra Jaya Agung

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 7 August 2016 · case 15/KPPU-L/2015 · 5 (LIMA) PAKET TENDER PENERANGAN JALAN UMUM (PJU) SIDOARJO, TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 DAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015 · fine IDR 189,353,365 · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

192. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Sarana Multi Sentosa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 7 August 2016 · case 15/KPPU-L/2015 · 5 (LIMA) PAKET TENDER PENERANGAN JALAN UMUM (PJU) SIDOARJO, TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 DAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015 · fine IDR 2,057,866,945 · respondent VI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

193. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV Azita Abadi

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 7 August 2016 · case 15/KPPU-L/2015 · 5 (LIMA) PAKET TENDER PENERANGAN JALAN UMUM (PJU) SIDOARJO, TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 DAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2015 · respondent VII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

194. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Cendana Indah Karya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 13 June 2016 · case 13/KPPU-L/2015 · PELELANGAN PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN KANTOR PEMERINTAH TAHAP II DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN NIAS SELATAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 · fine IDR 2 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

195. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Res Karya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 13 June 2016 · case 13/KPPU-L/2015 · PELELANGAN PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN KANTOR PEMERINTAH TAHAP II DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN NIAS SELATAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 · fine IDR 1,780,000,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

196. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Bandung Raya Indah Lestari

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 7 June 2016 · case 12/KPPU-L/2015 · PENGADAAN BADAN USAHA SECARA PELELANGAN UMUM DALAM RANGKA PEMBANGUNAN INFRASTRUKTUR PENGOLAHAN SAMPAH BERBASIS TEKNOLOGI RAMAH LINGKUNGAN MELALUI MEKANISME KERJASAMA PEMERINTAH DAERAH DENGAN BADAN USAHA · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

197. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     Perusahaan Daerah Kebersihan Kota Bandung

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 7 June 2016 · case 12/KPPU-L/2015 · PENGADAAN BADAN USAHA SECARA PELELANGAN UMUM DALAM RANGKA PEMBANGUNAN INFRASTRUKTUR PENGOLAHAN SAMPAH BERBASIS TEKNOLOGI RAMAH LINGKUNGAN MELALUI MEKANISME KERJASAMA PEMERINTAH DAERAH DENGAN BADAN USAHA · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

198. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Kakas Karya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 May 2016 · case 11/KPPU-L/2015 · PELELANGAN 2 PAKET REKONSTRUKSI JALAN DI LINGKUNGAN SATUAN KERJA PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL DAN SATUAN KERJA PERANGKAT DAERAH WILAYAH PROVINSI GORONTALO TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 · fine IDR 331,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

199. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Nikita Raya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 May 2016 · case 11/KPPU-L/2015 · PELELANGAN 2 PAKET REKONSTRUKSI JALAN DI LINGKUNGAN SATUAN KERJA PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL DAN SATUAN KERJA PERANGKAT DAERAH WILAYAH PROVINSI GORONTALO TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 · fine IDR 630,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

200. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Maesa Jaya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 May 2016 · case 11/KPPU-L/2015 · PELELANGAN 2 PAKET REKONSTRUKSI JALAN DI LINGKUNGAN SATUAN KERJA PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL DAN SATUAN KERJA PERANGKAT DAERAH WILAYAH PROVINSI GORONTALO TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 · fine IDR 106,000,000 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

201. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Andesmont Sakti

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 29 March 2016 · case 09/KPPU-I/2015 · PELELANGAN PAKET PEMBANGUNAN TERMINAL CONTAINER-CT3 PADA SATKER BADAN PENGUSAHAAN KAWASAN PERDAGANGAN BEBAS DAN PELABUHAN BEBAS (BPKS) SABANG TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 · fine IDR 599,479,760 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

202. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Tenaga Inti Makmu Beusare

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 29 March 2016 · case 09/KPPU-I/2015 · PELELANGAN PAKET PEMBANGUNAN TERMINAL CONTAINER-CT3 PADA SATKER BADAN PENGUSAHAAN KAWASAN PERDAGANGAN BEBAS DAN PELABUHAN BEBAS (BPKS) SABANG TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 · fine IDR 199,866,552 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

203. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV. Karya Ananda Farel

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 29 March 2016 · case 09/KPPU-I/2015 · PELELANGAN PAKET PEMBANGUNAN TERMINAL CONTAINER-CT3 PADA SATKER BADAN PENGUSAHAAN KAWASAN PERDAGANGAN BEBAS DAN PELABUHAN BEBAS (BPKS) SABANG TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 · fine IDR 199,866,552 · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

204. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Perdana Dinamika Persada

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 29 March 2016 · case 09/KPPU-I/2015 · PELELANGAN PAKET PEMBANGUNAN TERMINAL CONTAINER-CT3 PADA SATKER BADAN PENGUSAHAAN KAWASAN PERDAGANGAN BEBAS DAN PELABUHAN BEBAS (BPKS) SABANG TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 · fine IDR 199,866,552 · respondent VI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

205. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Enam Enam Group

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 5 February 2016 · case 07/KPPU-L/2015 · PELELANGAN PAKET-PAKET PEKERJAAN HUTM, HUTR, DAN TRAFO DISTRIBUSI DI PT PLN (PERSERO) UNIT PELAKSANA KONSTRUKSI KELISTRIKAN SATUAN KERJA LISTRIK PERDESAAN SUMATERA UTARA, APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 872,367,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

206. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Bahtera Mayori

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 5 February 2016 · case 07/KPPU-L/2015 · PELELANGAN PAKET-PAKET PEKERJAAN HUTM, HUTR, DAN TRAFO DISTRIBUSI DI PT PLN (PERSERO) UNIT PELAKSANA KONSTRUKSI KELISTRIKAN SATUAN KERJA LISTRIK PERDESAAN SUMATERA UTARA, APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 826,269,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

207. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Esha Sigma Pratama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 5 February 2016 · case 07/KPPU-L/2015 · PELELANGAN PAKET-PAKET PEKERJAAN HUTM, HUTR, DAN TRAFO DISTRIBUSI DI PT PLN (PERSERO) UNIT PELAKSANA KONSTRUKSI KELISTRIKAN SATUAN KERJA LISTRIK PERDESAAN SUMATERA UTARA, APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 797,572,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

208. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Global Menara Berdikari

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 5 February 2016 · case 07/KPPU-L/2015 · PELELANGAN PAKET-PAKET PEKERJAAN HUTM, HUTR, DAN TRAFO DISTRIBUSI DI PT PLN (PERSERO) UNIT PELAKSANA KONSTRUKSI KELISTRIKAN SATUAN KERJA LISTRIK PERDESAAN SUMATERA UTARA, APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 593,742,000 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

209. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV Tri Jaya Teknik

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 5 February 2016 · case 07/KPPU-L/2015 · PELELANGAN PAKET-PAKET PEKERJAAN HUTM, HUTR, DAN TRAFO DISTRIBUSI DI PT PLN (PERSERO) UNIT PELAKSANA KONSTRUKSI KELISTRIKAN SATUAN KERJA LISTRIK PERDESAAN SUMATERA UTARA, APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 57,652,000 · respondent IX of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

210. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Boyke Putra

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 5 February 2016 · case 07/KPPU-L/2015 · PELELANGAN PAKET-PAKET PEKERJAAN HUTM, HUTR, DAN TRAFO DISTRIBUSI DI PT PLN (PERSERO) UNIT PELAKSANA KONSTRUKSI KELISTRIKAN SATUAN KERJA LISTRIK PERDESAAN SUMATERA UTARA, APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 353,211,000 · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

211. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV Vicpa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 5 February 2016 · case 07/KPPU-L/2015 · PELELANGAN PAKET-PAKET PEKERJAAN HUTM, HUTR, DAN TRAFO DISTRIBUSI DI PT PLN (PERSERO) UNIT PELAKSANA KONSTRUKSI KELISTRIKAN SATUAN KERJA LISTRIK PERDESAAN SUMATERA UTARA, APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 258,974,000 · respondent VI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

212. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV Sauli Jaya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 5 February 2016 · case 07/KPPU-L/2015 · PELELANGAN PAKET-PAKET PEKERJAAN HUTM, HUTR, DAN TRAFO DISTRIBUSI DI PT PLN (PERSERO) UNIT PELAKSANA KONSTRUKSI KELISTRIKAN SATUAN KERJA LISTRIK PERDESAAN SUMATERA UTARA, APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 316,823,000 · respondent VII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

213. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV UT Rahman

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 5 February 2016 · case 07/KPPU-L/2015 · PELELANGAN PAKET-PAKET PEKERJAAN HUTM, HUTR, DAN TRAFO DISTRIBUSI DI PT PLN (PERSERO) UNIT PELAKSANA KONSTRUKSI KELISTRIKAN SATUAN KERJA LISTRIK PERDESAAN SUMATERA UTARA, APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 99,610,000 · respondent VIII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

214. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV Fariqi

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 5 February 2016 · case 07/KPPU-L/2015 · PELELANGAN PAKET-PAKET PEKERJAAN HUTM, HUTR, DAN TRAFO DISTRIBUSI DI PT PLN (PERSERO) UNIT PELAKSANA KONSTRUKSI KELISTRIKAN SATUAN KERJA LISTRIK PERDESAAN SUMATERA UTARA, APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 48,782,000 · respondent X of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

215. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Twink Indonesia

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 5 February 2016 · case 07/KPPU-L/2015 · PELELANGAN PAKET-PAKET PEKERJAAN HUTM, HUTR, DAN TRAFO DISTRIBUSI DI PT PLN (PERSERO) UNIT PELAKSANA KONSTRUKSI KELISTRIKAN SATUAN KERJA LISTRIK PERDESAAN SUMATERA UTARA, APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 5,037,427,000 · respondent XI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

216. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Tiga Pilar Sakato

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 5 February 2016 · case 07/KPPU-L/2015 · PELELANGAN PAKET-PAKET PEKERJAAN HUTM, HUTR, DAN TRAFO DISTRIBUSI DI PT PLN (PERSERO) UNIT PELAKSANA KONSTRUKSI KELISTRIKAN SATUAN KERJA LISTRIK PERDESAAN SUMATERA UTARA, APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 5,748,520,000 · respondent XII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

217. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Trafoindo Prima Perkasa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 5 February 2016 · case 07/KPPU-L/2015 · PELELANGAN PAKET-PAKET PEKERJAAN HUTM, HUTR, DAN TRAFO DISTRIBUSI DI PT PLN (PERSERO) UNIT PELAKSANA KONSTRUKSI KELISTRIKAN SATUAN KERJA LISTRIK PERDESAAN SUMATERA UTARA, APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 851,924,000 · respondent XIII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

218. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Sinarindo Wiranusa Elektrik

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 5 February 2016 · case 07/KPPU-L/2015 · PELELANGAN PAKET-PAKET PEKERJAAN HUTM, HUTR, DAN TRAFO DISTRIBUSI DI PT PLN (PERSERO) UNIT PELAKSANA KONSTRUKSI KELISTRIKAN SATUAN KERJA LISTRIK PERDESAAN SUMATERA UTARA, APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 5,641,935,000 · respondent XIV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

219. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Mega Kharisma Makmur

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 5 February 2016 · case 07/KPPU-L/2015 · PELELANGAN PAKET-PAKET PEKERJAAN HUTM, HUTR, DAN TRAFO DISTRIBUSI DI PT PLN (PERSERO) UNIT PELAKSANA KONSTRUKSI KELISTRIKAN SATUAN KERJA LISTRIK PERDESAAN SUMATERA UTARA, APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 781,526,000 · respondent XV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

220. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Citra Mahasurya Industries

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 5 February 2016 · case 07/KPPU-L/2015 · PELELANGAN PAKET-PAKET PEKERJAAN HUTM, HUTR, DAN TRAFO DISTRIBUSI DI PT PLN (PERSERO) UNIT PELAKSANA KONSTRUKSI KELISTRIKAN SATUAN KERJA LISTRIK PERDESAAN SUMATERA UTARA, APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 1,821,205,000 · respondent XVI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

221. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Kentjana Sakti Indonesia

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 5 February 2016 · case 07/KPPU-L/2015 · PELELANGAN PAKET-PAKET PEKERJAAN HUTM, HUTR, DAN TRAFO DISTRIBUSI DI PT PLN (PERSERO) UNIT PELAKSANA KONSTRUKSI KELISTRIKAN SATUAN KERJA LISTRIK PERDESAAN SUMATERA UTARA, APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 176,764,000 · respondent XVII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

222. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Gajah Mada Sarana

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 January 2016 · case 05/KPPU-L/2015 · TENDER REHAB/PEMELIHARAAN JALAN LINGKAR TIMUR KOTA PRABUMULIH PROVINSI SUMATERA SELATAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 1,446,151,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

223. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Bina Baraga Palembang

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 January 2016 · case 05/KPPU-L/2015 · TENDER REHAB/PEMELIHARAAN JALAN LINGKAR TIMUR KOTA PRABUMULIH PROVINSI SUMATERA SELATAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 850,677,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

224. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Dwi Graha Mandiri

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 January 2016 · case 05/KPPU-L/2015 · TENDER REHAB/PEMELIHARAAN JALAN LINGKAR TIMUR KOTA PRABUMULIH PROVINSI SUMATERA SELATAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 935,745,000 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

225. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Cindo Abadi Perkasa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 January 2016 · case 05/KPPU-L/2015 · TENDER REHAB/PEMELIHARAAN JALAN LINGKAR TIMUR KOTA PRABUMULIH PROVINSI SUMATERA SELATAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 935,745,000 · respondent VII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

226. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Krida Utama Mandiri

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 January 2016 · case 05/KPPU-L/2015 · TENDER REHAB/PEMELIHARAAN JALAN LINGKAR TIMUR KOTA PRABUMULIH PROVINSI SUMATERA SELATAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent VIII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

227. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Melista Karya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 December 2015 · case 04/KPPU-L/2015 · PAKET PELEBARAN JALAN BATAS PROPINSI JAWA BARAT-PATIMUAN-SIDAREJA DAN PAKET PELEBARAN JALAN SIDAREJA-JERUKLEGI, WILAYAH I JAWA TENGAH, PROVINSI JAWA TENGAH TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 1,669,582,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

228. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Panca Darma Puspawira

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 December 2015 · case 04/KPPU-L/2015 · PAKET PELEBARAN JALAN BATAS PROPINSI JAWA BARAT-PATIMUAN-SIDAREJA DAN PAKET PELEBARAN JALAN SIDAREJA-JERUKLEGI, WILAYAH I JAWA TENGAH, PROVINSI JAWA TENGAH TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 1,660,210,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

229. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Agung Darma Intra

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 December 2015 · case 04/KPPU-L/2015 · PAKET PELEBARAN JALAN BATAS PROPINSI JAWA BARAT-PATIMUAN-SIDAREJA DAN PAKET PELEBARAN JALAN SIDAREJA-JERUKLEGI, WILAYAH I JAWA TENGAH, PROVINSI JAWA TENGAH TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 1,660,210,000 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

230. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Cahaya Sempurna Sejati

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 December 2015 · case 04/KPPU-L/2015 · PAKET PELEBARAN JALAN BATAS PROPINSI JAWA BARAT-PATIMUAN-SIDAREJA DAN PAKET PELEBARAN JALAN SIDAREJA-JERUKLEGI, WILAYAH I JAWA TENGAH, PROVINSI JAWA TENGAH TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 369,976,000 · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

231. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Bumi Redjo

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 December 2015 · case 04/KPPU-L/2015 · PAKET PELEBARAN JALAN BATAS PROPINSI JAWA BARAT-PATIMUAN-SIDAREJA DAN PAKET PELEBARAN JALAN SIDAREJA-JERUKLEGI, WILAYAH I JAWA TENGAH, PROVINSI JAWA TENGAH TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent VI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

232. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Sabaritha Perkasa Abadi

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 December 2015 · case 03/KPPU-L/2015 · BERKAITAN DENGAN TENDER PEKERJAAN PELEBARAN JALAN MEREK – BTS. KAB. SIMALUNGUN – BTS. KAB. TANAH KARO – SERIBU DOLOK PADA KELOMPOK KERJA (POKJA) PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA SATUAN KERJA PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL WILAYAH I PROPINSI SUMATERA UTARA TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 3,750,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

233. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Dian Perkasa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 December 2015 · case 03/KPPU-L/2015 · BERKAITAN DENGAN TENDER PEKERJAAN PELEBARAN JALAN MEREK – BTS. KAB. SIMALUNGUN – BTS. KAB. TANAH KARO – SERIBU DOLOK PADA KELOMPOK KERJA (POKJA) PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA SATUAN KERJA PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL WILAYAH I PROPINSI SUMATERA UTARA TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 2,000,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

234. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Subur Sari Lastdericht

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 December 2015 · case 03/KPPU-L/2015 · BERKAITAN DENGAN TENDER PEKERJAAN PELEBARAN JALAN MEREK – BTS. KAB. SIMALUNGUN – BTS. KAB. TANAH KARO – SERIBU DOLOK PADA KELOMPOK KERJA (POKJA) PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA SATUAN KERJA PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL WILAYAH I PROPINSI SUMATERA UTARA TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 125,000,000 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

235. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Citra Kharisma Persada

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 7 December 2015 · case 06/KPPU-L/2015 · TENDER PEMBANGUNAN GEDUNG DPRD KABUPATEN BARITO KUALA DAN LAND DEVELOPMENTNYA TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013-2015 (MULTIYEARS) · fine IDR 242,002,360 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

236. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Cempaka Mulia Perkasa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 7 December 2015 · case 06/KPPU-L/2015 · TENDER PEMBANGUNAN GEDUNG DPRD KABUPATEN BARITO KUALA DAN LAND DEVELOPMENTNYA TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013-2015 (MULTIYEARS) · fine IDR 121,001,180 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

237. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Sumber Nor Abadi

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 7 December 2015 · case 06/KPPU-L/2015 · TENDER PEMBANGUNAN GEDUNG DPRD KABUPATEN BARITO KUALA DAN LAND DEVELOPMENTNYA TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013-2015 (MULTIYEARS) · fine IDR 40,333,726 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

238. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Maju Bersama Jaya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 15 September 2015 · case 02/KPPU-L/2015 · DENGAN PELELANGAN 4 (EMPAT) PAKET PEKERJAAN DI LINGKUNGAN KONSTRUKSI SNVT PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL PROVINSI KEPULAUAN RIAU, ULP BALAI BESAR PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL II KEMENTERIAN PEKERJAAN UMUM DENGAN SISTEM FULL-PROCUREMENT TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 · fine IDR 1,730,300,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

239. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Alam Beringin Mas

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 15 September 2015 · case 02/KPPU-L/2015 · DENGAN PELELANGAN 4 (EMPAT) PAKET PEKERJAAN DI LINGKUNGAN KONSTRUKSI SNVT PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL PROVINSI KEPULAUAN RIAU, ULP BALAI BESAR PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL II KEMENTERIAN PEKERJAAN UMUM DENGAN SISTEM FULL-PROCUREMENT TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 · fine IDR 1,948,650,000 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

240. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Sumber Kualastabas

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 15 September 2015 · case 02/KPPU-L/2015 · DENGAN PELELANGAN 4 (EMPAT) PAKET PEKERJAAN DI LINGKUNGAN KONSTRUKSI SNVT PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL PROVINSI KEPULAUAN RIAU, ULP BALAI BESAR PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL II KEMENTERIAN PEKERJAAN UMUM DENGAN SISTEM FULL-PROCUREMENT TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 · fine IDR 648,457,000 · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

241. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Asa Jaya Amalia

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 15 September 2015 · case 02/KPPU-L/2015 · DENGAN PELELANGAN 4 (EMPAT) PAKET PEKERJAAN DI LINGKUNGAN KONSTRUKSI SNVT PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL PROVINSI KEPULAUAN RIAU, ULP BALAI BESAR PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL II KEMENTERIAN PEKERJAAN UMUM DENGAN SISTEM FULL-PROCUREMENT TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 · fine IDR 618,050,000 · respondent VI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

242. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Aditya Kontraktor

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 15 September 2015 · case 02/KPPU-L/2015 · DENGAN PELELANGAN 4 (EMPAT) PAKET PEKERJAAN DI LINGKUNGAN KONSTRUKSI SNVT PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL PROVINSI KEPULAUAN RIAU, ULP BALAI BESAR PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL II KEMENTERIAN PEKERJAAN UMUM DENGAN SISTEM FULL-PROCUREMENT TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 · fine IDR 386,390,000 · respondent VII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

243. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Patens Agriutama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 15 September 2015 · case 02/KPPU-L/2015 · DENGAN PELELANGAN 4 (EMPAT) PAKET PEKERJAAN DI LINGKUNGAN KONSTRUKSI SNVT PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL PROVINSI KEPULAUAN RIAU, ULP BALAI BESAR PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL II KEMENTERIAN PEKERJAAN UMUM DENGAN SISTEM FULL-PROCUREMENT TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 · fine IDR 96,590,000 · respondent VIII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

244. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Gilang Pratama Jaya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 20 August 2015 · case 01/KPPU-L/2015 · 5 (LIMA) PAKET TENDER PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM, KABUPATEN ASAHAN, SUMATERA UTARA, TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

245. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Mentari Jasa Mulia

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 20 August 2015 · case 01/KPPU-L/2015 · 5 (LIMA) PAKET TENDER PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM, KABUPATEN ASAHAN, SUMATERA UTARA, TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

246. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Menara Kharisma Internusa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 20 August 2015 · case 01/KPPU-L/2015 · 5 (LIMA) PAKET TENDER PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM, KABUPATEN ASAHAN, SUMATERA UTARA, TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

247. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Fermada Tri Karya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 20 August 2015 · case 01/KPPU-L/2015 · 5 (LIMA) PAKET TENDER PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM, KABUPATEN ASAHAN, SUMATERA UTARA, TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent IX of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

248. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Deli Surya Jaya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 20 August 2015 · case 01/KPPU-L/2015 · 5 (LIMA) PAKET TENDER PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM, KABUPATEN ASAHAN, SUMATERA UTARA, TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

249. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Dwi Tunggal Bersama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 20 August 2015 · case 01/KPPU-L/2015 · 5 (LIMA) PAKET TENDER PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM, KABUPATEN ASAHAN, SUMATERA UTARA, TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent VI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

250. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Bin Ali

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 20 August 2015 · case 01/KPPU-L/2015 · 5 (LIMA) PAKET TENDER PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM, KABUPATEN ASAHAN, SUMATERA UTARA, TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent VII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

251. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Syahputra Anugrah Rijky

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 20 August 2015 · case 01/KPPU-L/2015 · 5 (LIMA) PAKET TENDER PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM, KABUPATEN ASAHAN, SUMATERA UTARA, TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent VIII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

252. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Adi Tehnik Equipindo

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 August 2015 · case 15/KPPU-I/2014 · PENGADAAN BUS TRANSJAKARTA (MEDIUM BUS, SINGLE BUS, DAN ARTICULATED BUS) TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 3,064,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

253. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Ifani Dewi

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 August 2015 · case 15/KPPU-I/2014 · PENGADAAN BUS TRANSJAKARTA (MEDIUM BUS, SINGLE BUS, DAN ARTICULATED BUS) TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 9,158,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

254. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Industri Kereta Api (Persero)

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 August 2015 · case 15/KPPU-I/2014 · PENGADAAN BUS TRANSJAKARTA (MEDIUM BUS, SINGLE BUS, DAN ARTICULATED BUS) TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 4,938,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

255. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Korindo Motors

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 August 2015 · case 15/KPPU-I/2014 · PENGADAAN BUS TRANSJAKARTA (MEDIUM BUS, SINGLE BUS, DAN ARTICULATED BUS) TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 5,040,000,000 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

256. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Antar Mitra Sejati

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 August 2015 · case 15/KPPU-I/2014 · PENGADAAN BUS TRANSJAKARTA (MEDIUM BUS, SINGLE BUS, DAN ARTICULATED BUS) TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 2,225,000,000 · respondent IX of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

257. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Mobilindo Armada Cemerlang

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 August 2015 · case 15/KPPU-I/2014 · PENGADAAN BUS TRANSJAKARTA (MEDIUM BUS, SINGLE BUS, DAN ARTICULATED BUS) TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 4,044,000,000 · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

258. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Putera Adi Karyajaya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 August 2015 · case 15/KPPU-I/2014 · PENGADAAN BUS TRANSJAKARTA (MEDIUM BUS, SINGLE BUS, DAN ARTICULATED BUS) TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 2,832,000,000 · respondent VI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

259. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Putriasi Utama Sari

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 August 2015 · case 15/KPPU-I/2014 · PENGADAAN BUS TRANSJAKARTA (MEDIUM BUS, SINGLE BUS, DAN ARTICULATED BUS) TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 3,620,000,000 · respondent VII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

260. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Saptaguna Dayaprima

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 August 2015 · case 15/KPPU-I/2014 · PENGADAAN BUS TRANSJAKARTA (MEDIUM BUS, SINGLE BUS, DAN ARTICULATED BUS) TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 5,175,000,000 · respondent VIII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

261. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Ibana Raja

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 August 2015 · case 15/KPPU-I/2014 · PENGADAAN BUS TRANSJAKARTA (MEDIUM BUS, SINGLE BUS, DAN ARTICULATED BUS) TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 937,000,000 · respondent X of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

262. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Indo Dongfeng Motor

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 August 2015 · case 15/KPPU-I/2014 · PENGADAAN BUS TRANSJAKARTA (MEDIUM BUS, SINGLE BUS, DAN ARTICULATED BUS) TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent XI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

263. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Mayapada Auto Sempurna

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 August 2015 · case 15/KPPU-I/2014 · PENGADAAN BUS TRANSJAKARTA (MEDIUM BUS, SINGLE BUS, DAN ARTICULATED BUS) TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 1,425,000,000 · respondent XII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

264. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Srikandi Metropolitan

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 August 2015 · case 15/KPPU-I/2014 · PENGADAAN BUS TRANSJAKARTA (MEDIUM BUS, SINGLE BUS, DAN ARTICULATED BUS) TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 910,000,000 · respondent XIII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

265. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Sugihjaya Dewantara

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 August 2015 · case 15/KPPU-I/2014 · PENGADAAN BUS TRANSJAKARTA (MEDIUM BUS, SINGLE BUS, DAN ARTICULATED BUS) TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 302,000,000 · respondent XIV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

266. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Transportindo Bakti Nusantara

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 August 2015 · case 15/KPPU-I/2014 · PENGADAAN BUS TRANSJAKARTA (MEDIUM BUS, SINGLE BUS, DAN ARTICULATED BUS) TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent XV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

267. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Viola Inovasi Berkarya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 August 2015 · case 15/KPPU-I/2014 · PENGADAAN BUS TRANSJAKARTA (MEDIUM BUS, SINGLE BUS, DAN ARTICULATED BUS) TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 818,000,000 · respondent XVI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

268. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Zonda Indonesia

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 August 2015 · case 15/KPPU-I/2014 · PENGADAAN BUS TRANSJAKARTA (MEDIUM BUS, SINGLE BUS, DAN ARTICULATED BUS) TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 99,000,000 · respondent XVII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

269. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT San Abadi

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 August 2015 · case 15/KPPU-I/2014 · PENGADAAN BUS TRANSJAKARTA (MEDIUM BUS, SINGLE BUS, DAN ARTICULATED BUS) TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 25,000,000,000 · respondent XVIII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

270. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV. Adi Perkasa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 April 2015 · case 10/KPPU-L/2014 · DALAM PELANGGARAN PASAL 22 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1999 DI PENGADAAN BARANG CETAKAN DAN PENGGANDAAN PERLENGKAPAN KPPS/TPS, PPS, DAN PPK PEMILIHAN GUBERNUR DAN WAKIL GUBERNUR SULAWESI SELATAN TAHUN 2013 · fine IDR 1,000,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

271. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV Muthmainnah

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 April 2015 · case 10/KPPU-L/2014 · DALAM PELANGGARAN PASAL 22 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1999 DI PENGADAAN BARANG CETAKAN DAN PENGGANDAAN PERLENGKAPAN KPPS/TPS, PPS, DAN PPK PEMILIHAN GUBERNUR DAN WAKIL GUBERNUR SULAWESI SELATAN TAHUN 2013 · fine IDR 185,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

272. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV Yunico Lestari

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 April 2015 · case 10/KPPU-L/2014 · DALAM PELANGGARAN PASAL 22 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1999 DI PENGADAAN BARANG CETAKAN DAN PENGGANDAAN PERLENGKAPAN KPPS/TPS, PPS, DAN PPK PEMILIHAN GUBERNUR DAN WAKIL GUBERNUR SULAWESI SELATAN TAHUN 2013 · fine IDR 193,000,000 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

273. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV Biluhu Tengah Permai

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 April 2015 · case 10/KPPU-L/2014 · DALAM PELANGGARAN PASAL 22 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1999 DI PENGADAAN BARANG CETAKAN DAN PENGGANDAAN PERLENGKAPAN KPPS/TPS, PPS, DAN PPK PEMILIHAN GUBERNUR DAN WAKIL GUBERNUR SULAWESI SELATAN TAHUN 2013 · fine IDR 138,000,000 · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

274. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV. Burung Nuri

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 14 April 2015 · case 16/KPPU-L/2014 · PENGADAAN SARANA PENINGKATAN MUTU PENDIDIKAN DI SD/SDLB DI DINAS PENIDIDIKAN KABUPATEN PROBOLINGGO, JAWA TIMUR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2012 · fine IDR 457,733,600 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

275. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV. Satriya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 14 April 2015 · case 16/KPPU-L/2014 · PENGADAAN SARANA PENINGKATAN MUTU PENDIDIKAN DI SD/SDLB DI DINAS PENIDIDIKAN KABUPATEN PROBOLINGGO, JAWA TIMUR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2012 · fine IDR 130,781,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

276. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Zasiro Bastara

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 1 April 2015 · case 18/KPPU-L/2014 · TENDER PENGADAAN KERAMBA JARING APUNG HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) DI LINGKUNGAN POKJA 7 UNIT LAYANAN PENGADAAN PEMERINTAH PROVINSI KEPULAUAN RIAU TAHUN ANGGARAN 2012 · fine IDR 946,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

277. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Mitra Riau Perkasa Lestari

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 1 April 2015 · case 18/KPPU-L/2014 · TENDER PENGADAAN KERAMBA JARING APUNG HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) DI LINGKUNGAN POKJA 7 UNIT LAYANAN PENGADAAN PEMERINTAH PROVINSI KEPULAUAN RIAU TAHUN ANGGARAN 2012 · fine IDR 105,000,000 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

278. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Media Cipta Perkasa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 24 March 2015 · case 19/KPPU-L/2014 · BERKAITAN DENGAN TENDER PEKERJAAN REVITALISASI PEMBANGUNAN GELANGGANG PEMUDA/ REMAJA PROPINSI NUSA TENGGARA BARAT TAHUN ANGGARAN 2011 · fine IDR 816,786,102 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

279. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Gaung Nusa Persada

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 28 January 2015 · case 17/KPPU-L/2014 · TENDER PEMBANGUNAN GEDUNG (PARUGA) SAMAKAI KABUPATEN DOMPU PROPINSI NUSA TENGGARA BARAT TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 · fine IDR 332,000,000 · barred from tenders for 1 year · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

280. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Satria Multi Guna

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 28 January 2015 · case 17/KPPU-L/2014 · TENDER PEMBANGUNAN GEDUNG (PARUGA) SAMAKAI KABUPATEN DOMPU PROPINSI NUSA TENGGARA BARAT TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 · barred from tenders for 1 year · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

281. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Mas Merce Sari

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 28 January 2015 · case 17/KPPU-L/2014 · TENDER PEMBANGUNAN GEDUNG (PARUGA) SAMAKAI KABUPATEN DOMPU PROPINSI NUSA TENGGARA BARAT TAHUN ANGGARAN 2014 · barred from tenders for 1 year · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

282. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Gajah Mada Sarana

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 21 January 2015 · case 11/KPPU-L/2014 · DUA PAKET LELANG PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM BINA MARGA KEGIATAN JALAN DAN JEMBATAN PEMERINTAH KABUPATEN OGAN ILIR PROPINSI SUMATERA SELATAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 1,533,000,000 · barred from tenders for 1 year · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

283. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Bina Baraga Palembang

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 21 January 2015 · case 11/KPPU-L/2014 · DUA PAKET LELANG PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM BINA MARGA KEGIATAN JALAN DAN JEMBATAN PEMERINTAH KABUPATEN OGAN ILIR PROPINSI SUMATERA SELATAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 1,254,000,000 · barred from tenders for 1 year · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

284. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Gema Pancoran Jaya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 21 January 2015 · case 11/KPPU-L/2014 · DUA PAKET LELANG PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM BINA MARGA KEGIATAN JALAN DAN JEMBATAN PEMERINTAH KABUPATEN OGAN ILIR PROPINSI SUMATERA SELATAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 1,254,000,000 · barred from tenders for 1 year · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

285. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Bina Hilir Utama Niaga

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 21 January 2015 · case 11/KPPU-L/2014 · DUA PAKET LELANG PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM BINA MARGA KEGIATAN JALAN DAN JEMBATAN PEMERINTAH KABUPATEN OGAN ILIR PROPINSI SUMATERA SELATAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 352,000,000 · barred from tenders for 1 year · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

286. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Pratama Mandiri Sentosa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 21 January 2015 · case 11/KPPU-L/2014 · DUA PAKET LELANG PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM BINA MARGA KEGIATAN JALAN DAN JEMBATAN PEMERINTAH KABUPATEN OGAN ILIR PROPINSI SUMATERA SELATAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2013 · fine IDR 100,000,000 · barred from tenders for 1 year · respondent VI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

287. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Sarana Gita Sentosa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 3 December 2014 · case 09/KPPU-L/2014 · PELELANGAN UMUM PENGADAAN JASA KONSTRUKSI 3 PAKET REHABILITASI/PEMELIHARAAN JALAN DAN PEMBANGUNAN JALAN DI KAB. MINAHASA UTARA, PROVINSI SULAWESI UTARA TA 2011 & 2012 · fine IDR 1,100,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

288. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Sinar Terang Lestari

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 3 December 2014 · case 09/KPPU-L/2014 · PELELANGAN UMUM PENGADAAN JASA KONSTRUKSI 3 PAKET REHABILITASI/PEMELIHARAAN JALAN DAN PEMBANGUNAN JALAN DI KAB. MINAHASA UTARA, PROVINSI SULAWESI UTARA TA 2011 & 2012 · fine IDR 375,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

289. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Sinar Karya Mega Persada

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 3 December 2014 · case 09/KPPU-L/2014 · PELELANGAN UMUM PENGADAAN JASA KONSTRUKSI 3 PAKET REHABILITASI/PEMELIHARAAN JALAN DAN PEMBANGUNAN JALAN DI KAB. MINAHASA UTARA, PROVINSI SULAWESI UTARA TA 2011 & 2012 · fine IDR 295,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

290. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Ericko Grant Dinarto

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 3 December 2014 · case 09/KPPU-L/2014 · PELELANGAN UMUM PENGADAAN JASA KONSTRUKSI 3 PAKET REHABILITASI/PEMELIHARAAN JALAN DAN PEMBANGUNAN JALAN DI KAB. MINAHASA UTARA, PROVINSI SULAWESI UTARA TA 2011 & 2012 · fine IDR 153,000,000 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

291. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Wira Karya Duta Utama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 November 2014 · case 06/KPPU-L/2014 · PELELANGAN PEMBANGUNAN ASRAMA MA – HAD ALI SEKOLAH TINGGI AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI (STAIN) PADANG SIDEMPUAN, SUMATERA UTARA SUMBER DANA PEMANFAATAN PENGHEMATAN KEMENTERIAN AGAMA REPUBLIK INDONESIA APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2011 DAN 2012 YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH POKJA PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA SEKOLAH TINGGI AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI (STAIN) PADANGSIDEMPUAN, PT WIRA KARYA DUTA UTAMA, PT HARIDA JAYA, PT WIRA INDO KARYA UTAMA DAN PT WELLY KARYA NUSANTARA · fine IDR 80,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

292. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Harida Jaya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 November 2014 · case 06/KPPU-L/2014 · PELELANGAN PEMBANGUNAN ASRAMA MA – HAD ALI SEKOLAH TINGGI AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI (STAIN) PADANG SIDEMPUAN, SUMATERA UTARA SUMBER DANA PEMANFAATAN PENGHEMATAN KEMENTERIAN AGAMA REPUBLIK INDONESIA APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2011 DAN 2012 YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH POKJA PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA SEKOLAH TINGGI AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI (STAIN) PADANGSIDEMPUAN, PT WIRA KARYA DUTA UTAMA, PT HARIDA JAYA, PT WIRA INDO KARYA UTAMA DAN PT WELLY KARYA NUSANTARA · fine IDR 103,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

293. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Wira Indo Karya Utama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 November 2014 · case 06/KPPU-L/2014 · PELELANGAN PEMBANGUNAN ASRAMA MA – HAD ALI SEKOLAH TINGGI AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI (STAIN) PADANG SIDEMPUAN, SUMATERA UTARA SUMBER DANA PEMANFAATAN PENGHEMATAN KEMENTERIAN AGAMA REPUBLIK INDONESIA APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2011 DAN 2012 YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH POKJA PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA SEKOLAH TINGGI AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI (STAIN) PADANGSIDEMPUAN, PT WIRA KARYA DUTA UTAMA, PT HARIDA JAYA, PT WIRA INDO KARYA UTAMA DAN PT WELLY KARYA NUSANTARA · fine IDR 211,000,000 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

294. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Elisabeth

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 November 2014 · case 06/KPPU-L/2014 · PELELANGAN PEMBANGUNAN ASRAMA MA – HAD ALI SEKOLAH TINGGI AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI (STAIN) PADANG SIDEMPUAN, SUMATERA UTARA SUMBER DANA PEMANFAATAN PENGHEMATAN KEMENTERIAN AGAMA REPUBLIK INDONESIA APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2011 DAN 2012 YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH POKJA PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA SEKOLAH TINGGI AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI (STAIN) PADANGSIDEMPUAN, PT WIRA KARYA DUTA UTAMA, PT HARIDA JAYA, PT WIRA INDO KARYA UTAMA DAN PT WELLY KARYA NUSANTARA · fine IDR 80,000,000 · respondent IX of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

295. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Welly Karya Nusantara

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 November 2014 · case 06/KPPU-L/2014 · PELELANGAN PEMBANGUNAN ASRAMA MA – HAD ALI SEKOLAH TINGGI AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI (STAIN) PADANG SIDEMPUAN, SUMATERA UTARA SUMBER DANA PEMANFAATAN PENGHEMATAN KEMENTERIAN AGAMA REPUBLIK INDONESIA APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2011 DAN 2012 YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH POKJA PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA SEKOLAH TINGGI AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI (STAIN) PADANGSIDEMPUAN, PT WIRA KARYA DUTA UTAMA, PT HARIDA JAYA, PT WIRA INDO KARYA UTAMA DAN PT WELLY KARYA NUSANTARA · fine IDR 108,000,000 · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

296. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Putra Sonak Malela

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 November 2014 · case 06/KPPU-L/2014 · PELELANGAN PEMBANGUNAN ASRAMA MA – HAD ALI SEKOLAH TINGGI AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI (STAIN) PADANG SIDEMPUAN, SUMATERA UTARA SUMBER DANA PEMANFAATAN PENGHEMATAN KEMENTERIAN AGAMA REPUBLIK INDONESIA APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2011 DAN 2012 YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH POKJA PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA SEKOLAH TINGGI AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI (STAIN) PADANGSIDEMPUAN, PT WIRA KARYA DUTA UTAMA, PT HARIDA JAYA, PT WIRA INDO KARYA UTAMA DAN PT WELLY KARYA NUSANTARA · fine IDR 88,000,000 · respondent VI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

297. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Kolega

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 November 2014 · case 06/KPPU-L/2014 · PELELANGAN PEMBANGUNAN ASRAMA MA – HAD ALI SEKOLAH TINGGI AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI (STAIN) PADANG SIDEMPUAN, SUMATERA UTARA SUMBER DANA PEMANFAATAN PENGHEMATAN KEMENTERIAN AGAMA REPUBLIK INDONESIA APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2011 DAN 2012 YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH POKJA PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA SEKOLAH TINGGI AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI (STAIN) PADANGSIDEMPUAN, PT WIRA KARYA DUTA UTAMA, PT HARIDA JAYA, PT WIRA INDO KARYA UTAMA DAN PT WELLY KARYA NUSANTARA · fine IDR 108,000,000 · respondent VII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

298. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Faisal Contractor

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 November 2014 · case 06/KPPU-L/2014 · PELELANGAN PEMBANGUNAN ASRAMA MA – HAD ALI SEKOLAH TINGGI AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI (STAIN) PADANG SIDEMPUAN, SUMATERA UTARA SUMBER DANA PEMANFAATAN PENGHEMATAN KEMENTERIAN AGAMA REPUBLIK INDONESIA APBN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2011 DAN 2012 YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH POKJA PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA SEKOLAH TINGGI AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI (STAIN) PADANGSIDEMPUAN, PT WIRA KARYA DUTA UTAMA, PT HARIDA JAYA, PT WIRA INDO KARYA UTAMA DAN PT WELLY KARYA NUSANTARA · fine IDR 80,000,000 · respondent VIII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

299. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Arafah Alam Sejahtera

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 28 August 2014 · case 12/KPPU-L/2013 · DUGAAN PELANGGARAN UNDANG - UNDANG NO. 5 TAHUN 1999 TERKAIT TENDER PEMBUKAAN/PEMBANGUNAN JALAN TANJUNG AGUNG - SIMPANG PAGAR AGUNG - DANAU LIANG DI KABUPATEN LEBONG PROVINSI BENGKULU TA 2011 · fine IDR 29,000,000 · respondent VIII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

300. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Masmo Masjaya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 12 June 2014 · case 10/KPPU-L/2013 · (SELANJUTNYA DISEBUT UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 5 TAHUN 1999) TERKAIT TENDER PENGADAAN ALAT KEDOKTERAN, KESEHATAN DAN KB DI RUMAH SAKIT UMUM DAERAH (RSUD) EMBUNG FATIMAH KOTA BATAM TAHUN ANGGARAN 2011 · fine IDR 900,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

301. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Sangga Cipta Perwita

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 12 June 2014 · case 10/KPPU-L/2013 · (SELANJUTNYA DISEBUT UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 5 TAHUN 1999) TERKAIT TENDER PENGADAAN ALAT KEDOKTERAN, KESEHATAN DAN KB DI RUMAH SAKIT UMUM DAERAH (RSUD) EMBUNG FATIMAH KOTA BATAM TAHUN ANGGARAN 2011 · fine IDR 450,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

302. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Trigels Indonesia

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 12 June 2014 · case 10/KPPU-L/2013 · (SELANJUTNYA DISEBUT UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 5 TAHUN 1999) TERKAIT TENDER PENGADAAN ALAT KEDOKTERAN, KESEHATAN DAN KB DI RUMAH SAKIT UMUM DAERAH (RSUD) EMBUNG FATIMAH KOTA BATAM TAHUN ANGGARAN 2011 · fine IDR 100,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

303. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV Duta Mulya Pratama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 14 April 2014 · case 08/KPPU-L/2013 · TENDER PENGADAAN PERALATAN CT SCAN DI RSUD DR. PIRNGADI KOTA MEDAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2012 · fine IDR 528,556,700 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

304. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Menara Fazira Abadi

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 14 April 2014 · case 08/KPPU-L/2013 · TENDER PENGADAAN PERALATAN CT SCAN DI RSUD DR. PIRNGADI KOTA MEDAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2012 · fine IDR 264,278,350 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

305. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Graha Insani Mandiri

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 14 April 2014 · case 08/KPPU-L/2013 · TENDER PENGADAAN PERALATAN CT SCAN DI RSUD DR. PIRNGADI KOTA MEDAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2012 · fine IDR 158,567,010 · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

306. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV Rifki Abadi

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 14 April 2014 · case 08/KPPU-L/2013 · TENDER PENGADAAN PERALATAN CT SCAN DI RSUD DR. PIRNGADI KOTA MEDAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2012 · fine IDR 52,855,670 · respondent VI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

307. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Ifani Dewi

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 January 2014 · case 04/KPPU-L/2013 · TENDER PENGADAAN ALAT BERAT/ALAT BANTU DI BALAI PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL VIII DIREKTORAT JENDERAL BINA MARGA KEMENTERIAN PEKERJAAN UMUM TAHUN ANGGARAN 2011 · fine IDR 1,952,280,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

308. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Antar Mitra Sejati

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 January 2014 · case 04/KPPU-L/2013 · TENDER PENGADAAN ALAT BERAT/ALAT BANTU DI BALAI PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL VIII DIREKTORAT JENDERAL BINA MARGA KEMENTERIAN PEKERJAAN UMUM TAHUN ANGGARAN 2011 · fine IDR 1,952,280,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

309. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV Kharisma Permai

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 October 2013 · case 03/KPPU-L/2013 · TENDER PENGADAAN 30 UNIT TRAKTOR BESAR DI BADAN PENANGGULANGAN BENCANA DAERAH PROPINSI NUSA TENGGARA TIMUR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2010 · fine IDR 232,571,690 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

310. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV Cemara Abadi

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 October 2013 · case 03/KPPU-L/2013 · TENDER PENGADAAN 30 UNIT TRAKTOR BESAR DI BADAN PENANGGULANGAN BENCANA DAERAH PROPINSI NUSA TENGGARA TIMUR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2010 · fine IDR 232,571,690 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

311. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV Putra Kencana Perkasa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 October 2013 · case 03/KPPU-L/2013 · TENDER PENGADAAN 30 UNIT TRAKTOR BESAR DI BADAN PENANGGULANGAN BENCANA DAERAH PROPINSI NUSA TENGGARA TIMUR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2010 · fine IDR 232,571,690 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

312. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV. Budi Utomo

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 29 July 2013 · case 01/KPPU-L/2013 · TENDER PENGADAAN BARANG CETAKAN DAN ALAT PERAGA DINAS PENDIDIKAN DAERAH KABUPATEN TAPANULI SELATAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2011 (PAKET 1 DAN PAKET 13) · fine IDR 50,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

313. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Madju Medan Cipta

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 29 July 2013 · case 01/KPPU-L/2013 · TENDER PENGADAAN BARANG CETAKAN DAN ALAT PERAGA DINAS PENDIDIKAN DAERAH KABUPATEN TAPANULI SELATAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2011 (PAKET 1 DAN PAKET 13) · fine IDR 250,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

314. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV. Padang Mas

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 29 July 2013 · case 01/KPPU-L/2013 · TENDER PENGADAAN BARANG CETAKAN DAN ALAT PERAGA DINAS PENDIDIKAN DAERAH KABUPATEN TAPANULI SELATAN TAHUN ANGGARAN 2011 (PAKET 1 DAN PAKET 13) · fine IDR 50,000,000 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

315. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Zuty Wijaya Sejati

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 12 July 2013 · case 06/KPPU-L/2012 · TENDER PEMBANGUNAN TERMINAL ALBN SEI AMBAWANG TAHAP KE XI TAHUN ANGGARAN 2012 · fine IDR 1,819,125,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

316. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Menarabaja Saranasakti

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 12 July 2013 · case 06/KPPU-L/2012 · TENDER PEMBANGUNAN TERMINAL ALBN SEI AMBAWANG TAHAP KE XI TAHUN ANGGARAN 2012 · fine IDR 330,750,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

317. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Abdi Jasa Tama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 12 July 2013 · case 06/KPPU-L/2012 · TENDER PEMBANGUNAN TERMINAL ALBN SEI AMBAWANG TAHAP KE XI TAHUN ANGGARAN 2012 · fine IDR 413,437,500 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

318. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Asria Jaya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 12 July 2013 · case 06/KPPU-L/2012 · TENDER PEMBANGUNAN TERMINAL ALBN SEI AMBAWANG TAHAP KE XI TAHUN ANGGARAN 2012 · fine IDR 99,225,000 · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

319. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Asria Nurlindra Inti Sejahtera

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 12 July 2013 · case 06/KPPU-L/2012 · TENDER PEMBANGUNAN TERMINAL ALBN SEI AMBAWANG TAHAP KE XI TAHUN ANGGARAN 2012 · fine IDR 99,225,000 · respondent VI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

320. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Graha Karya Semesta

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 8 July 2013 · case 07/KPPU-L/2012 · PELELANGAN UMUM BADAN HUKUM MITRA KERJA SAMA PEMBANGUNAN PASAR TRADISIONAL SEMI MODERN POLA BANGUN GUNA SERAH (BUILD OPERATE TRANSFER - BOT) DI KABUPATEN SUKABUMI TAHUN 2011 · fine IDR 10,000,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

321. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Patirindo Tama Bersama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 8 July 2013 · case 07/KPPU-L/2012 · PELELANGAN UMUM BADAN HUKUM MITRA KERJA SAMA PEMBANGUNAN PASAR TRADISIONAL SEMI MODERN POLA BANGUN GUNA SERAH (BUILD OPERATE TRANSFER - BOT) DI KABUPATEN SUKABUMI TAHUN 2011 · fine IDR 10,000,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

322. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Pola Mitra Jaya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 8 July 2013 · case 07/KPPU-L/2012 · PELELANGAN UMUM BADAN HUKUM MITRA KERJA SAMA PEMBANGUNAN PASAR TRADISIONAL SEMI MODERN POLA BANGUN GUNA SERAH (BUILD OPERATE TRANSFER - BOT) DI KABUPATEN SUKABUMI TAHUN 2011 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

323. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Waskita Karya (Persero)

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 9 April 2013 · case 04/KPPU-L/2012 · DALAM TENDER PEMBANGUNAN GEDUNG PELAYANAN DAN PERAWATAN KELAS I DAN VIP RUMAH SAKIT SULAWESI TENGGARA TAHUN ANGGARAN 2011 · fine IDR 4,475,525,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

324. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Adhi Karya (Persero), Tbk

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 9 April 2013 · case 04/KPPU-L/2012 · DALAM TENDER PEMBANGUNAN GEDUNG PELAYANAN DAN PERAWATAN KELAS I DAN VIP RUMAH SAKIT SULAWESI TENGGARA TAHUN ANGGARAN 2011 · fine IDR 4,475,525,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

325. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     Konsorsium PNRI

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 13 November 2012 · case 03/KPPU-L/2012 · TENDER PENERAPAN KARTU TANDA PENDUDUK BERBASIS NIK SECARA NASIONAL (KTP ELEKTRONIK) TAHUN 2011 S/D 2012 · fine IDR 4,000,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

326. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Astragraphia

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 13 November 2012 · case 03/KPPU-L/2012 · TENDER PENERAPAN KARTU TANDA PENDUDUK BERBASIS NIK SECARA NASIONAL (KTP ELEKTRONIK) TAHUN 2011 S/D 2012 · fine IDR 4,000,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

327. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Wijaya Kusuma Emindo

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 16 October 2012 · case 02/KPPU-L/2012 · TENDER PAKET PEKERJAAN DI LINGKUNGAN SATUAN KERJA PENGEMBANGAN KINERJA PENGELOLAAN AIR MINUM DI PROPINSI SUMATERA BARAT TAHUN ANGGARAN 2011 · fine IDR 513,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

328. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Juhdi Sakti Engineering

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 16 October 2012 · case 02/KPPU-L/2012 · TENDER PAKET PEKERJAAN DI LINGKUNGAN SATUAN KERJA PENGEMBANGAN KINERJA PENGELOLAAN AIR MINUM DI PROPINSI SUMATERA BARAT TAHUN ANGGARAN 2011 · fine IDR 532,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

329. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Lepen Kencana Utama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 16 October 2012 · case 02/KPPU-L/2012 · TENDER PAKET PEKERJAAN DI LINGKUNGAN SATUAN KERJA PENGEMBANGAN KINERJA PENGELOLAAN AIR MINUM DI PROPINSI SUMATERA BARAT TAHUN ANGGARAN 2011 · fine IDR 513,000,000 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

330. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Supin Raya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 1 October 2012 · case 12/KPPU-L/2011 · TENDER ULANG PAKET PEKERJAAN PENGADAAN BIBIT KAKAO SOMATIC EMBRIOGENESIS (SE) DENGAN SUMBER DANA APBN MELALUI DIPA BAGIAN ANGGARAN 999 TAHUN ANGGARAN 2010 SATUAN KERJA DINAS PERKEBUNAN PROVINSI SULAWESI BARAT · fine IDR 600,000,000 · barred from tenders for 1 year · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

331. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Anugerah Langgeng Sentosa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 1 October 2012 · case 12/KPPU-L/2011 · TENDER ULANG PAKET PEKERJAAN PENGADAAN BIBIT KAKAO SOMATIC EMBRIOGENESIS (SE) DENGAN SUMBER DANA APBN MELALUI DIPA BAGIAN ANGGARAN 999 TAHUN ANGGARAN 2010 SATUAN KERJA DINAS PERKEBUNAN PROVINSI SULAWESI BARAT · barred from tenders for 1 year · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

332. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Karimun Bahagia

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 29 June 2012 · case 13/KPPU-L/2011 · PELELANGAN PAKET PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN JALAN SP. MUTIARA-PESISIR SELATAN DI LINGKUNGAN DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN KARIMUN PROVINSI KEPULAUAN RIAU TAHUN ANGGARAN 2011 · fine IDR 250,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

333. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Nuansa Megah Perkasa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 29 June 2012 · case 13/KPPU-L/2011 · PELELANGAN PAKET PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN JALAN SP. MUTIARA-PESISIR SELATAN DI LINGKUNGAN DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN KARIMUN PROVINSI KEPULAUAN RIAU TAHUN ANGGARAN 2011 · fine IDR 100,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

334. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Mandailing Tanjung Perkasa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 29 June 2012 · case 13/KPPU-L/2011 · PELELANGAN PAKET PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN JALAN SP. MUTIARA-PESISIR SELATAN DI LINGKUNGAN DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN KARIMUN PROVINSI KEPULAUAN RIAU TAHUN ANGGARAN 2011 · fine IDR 75,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

335. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Agung Prima Jaya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 29 June 2012 · case 13/KPPU-L/2011 · PELELANGAN PAKET PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN JALAN SP. MUTIARA-PESISIR SELATAN DI LINGKUNGAN DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN KARIMUN PROVINSI KEPULAUAN RIAU TAHUN ANGGARAN 2011 · fine IDR 100,000,000 · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

336. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Surya Karya Sari

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 1 March 2012 · case 10/KPPU-L/2011 · TENDER PEKERJAAN PENINGKATAN JALAN DI DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM PERTAMBANGAN DAN ENERGI, KABUPATEN LOMBOK UTARA PROPINSI NUSA TENGGARA BARAT TAHUN ANGGARAN 2010 · fine IDR 200,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

337. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Cipta Sinar Utama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 1 March 2012 · case 10/KPPU-L/2011 · TENDER PEKERJAAN PENINGKATAN JALAN DI DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM PERTAMBANGAN DAN ENERGI, KABUPATEN LOMBOK UTARA PROPINSI NUSA TENGGARA BARAT TAHUN ANGGARAN 2010 · fine IDR 200,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

338. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Idee Murni Pratama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 1 March 2012 · case 10/KPPU-L/2011 · TENDER PEKERJAAN PENINGKATAN JALAN DI DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM PERTAMBANGAN DAN ENERGI, KABUPATEN LOMBOK UTARA PROPINSI NUSA TENGGARA BARAT TAHUN ANGGARAN 2010 · fine IDR 350,000,000 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

339. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Aneka Jasa Pembangunan

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 1 March 2012 · case 10/KPPU-L/2011 · TENDER PEKERJAAN PENINGKATAN JALAN DI DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM PERTAMBANGAN DAN ENERGI, KABUPATEN LOMBOK UTARA PROPINSI NUSA TENGGARA BARAT TAHUN ANGGARAN 2010 · fine IDR 100,000,000 · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

340. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Cita Yasa Perdana

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 February 2012 · case 11/KPPU-L/2011 · LELANG JASA PELAYANAN TEKNIK POLA 3 TAHUN 2011-2012 ZONA I (UPJ JEMBER KOTA, UPJ KALISAT, UPJ AMBULU) ZONA II (UPJ TANGGUL, UPJ KENCONG, UPJ RAMBIPUJI), ZONA III (UPJ LUMAJANG, UPJ KLAKAH, UPJ TEMPEH) DI PT.PLN (PERSERO) APJ JEMBER TAHUN ANGGARAN 2010 · fine IDR 50,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

341. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Prima Persada Nusantara

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 February 2012 · case 11/KPPU-L/2011 · LELANG JASA PELAYANAN TEKNIK POLA 3 TAHUN 2011-2012 ZONA I (UPJ JEMBER KOTA, UPJ KALISAT, UPJ AMBULU) ZONA II (UPJ TANGGUL, UPJ KENCONG, UPJ RAMBIPUJI), ZONA III (UPJ LUMAJANG, UPJ KLAKAH, UPJ TEMPEH) DI PT.PLN (PERSERO) APJ JEMBER TAHUN ANGGARAN 2010 · fine IDR 571,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

342. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Bintang Kadiri

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 February 2012 · case 11/KPPU-L/2011 · LELANG JASA PELAYANAN TEKNIK POLA 3 TAHUN 2011-2012 ZONA I (UPJ JEMBER KOTA, UPJ KALISAT, UPJ AMBULU) ZONA II (UPJ TANGGUL, UPJ KENCONG, UPJ RAMBIPUJI), ZONA III (UPJ LUMAJANG, UPJ KLAKAH, UPJ TEMPEH) DI PT.PLN (PERSERO) APJ JEMBER TAHUN ANGGARAN 2010 · fine IDR 115,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

343. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Credo Indoelektra

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 February 2012 · case 11/KPPU-L/2011 · LELANG JASA PELAYANAN TEKNIK POLA 3 TAHUN 2011-2012 ZONA I (UPJ JEMBER KOTA, UPJ KALISAT, UPJ AMBULU) ZONA II (UPJ TANGGUL, UPJ KENCONG, UPJ RAMBIPUJI), ZONA III (UPJ LUMAJANG, UPJ KLAKAH, UPJ TEMPEH) DI PT.PLN (PERSERO) APJ JEMBER TAHUN ANGGARAN 2010 · fine IDR 115,000,000 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

344. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Budiindah Muliamandiri

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 January 2012 · case 09/KPPU-I/2011 · TENDER PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN LAUT SAMBOJA DI DINAS PERHUBUNGAN KABUPATEN KUTAI KERTANEGARA PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TIMUR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · fine IDR 579,150,000 · barred from tenders for 3 years · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

345. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Tri Perkasa Aminindah

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 January 2012 · case 09/KPPU-I/2011 · TENDER PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN LAUT SAMBOJA DI DINAS PERHUBUNGAN KABUPATEN KUTAI KERTANEGARA PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TIMUR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · fine IDR 473,850,000 · barred from tenders for 1 year · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

346. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Tanjung Nusa Persada

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 January 2012 · case 09/KPPU-I/2011 · TENDER PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN LAUT SAMBOJA DI DINAS PERHUBUNGAN KABUPATEN KUTAI KERTANEGARA PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TIMUR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · fine IDR 579,150,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

347. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Penata Karya Keluarga Utama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 January 2012 · case 09/KPPU-I/2011 · TENDER PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN LAUT SAMBOJA DI DINAS PERHUBUNGAN KABUPATEN KUTAI KERTANEGARA PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TIMUR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · fine IDR 473,850,000 · barred from tenders for 1 year · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

348. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Kharisma Tropisindo Makmur Abadi

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 January 2012 · case 09/KPPU-I/2011 · TENDER PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN LAUT SAMBOJA DI DINAS PERHUBUNGAN KABUPATEN KUTAI KERTANEGARA PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TIMUR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · fine IDR 579,150,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

349. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Kembar Jaya Abadi

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 27 December 2011 · case 07/KPPU-I/2011 · TENDER PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN LAUT SAMBOJA, PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN TERPADU DI KECAMATAN KOTA BANGUN PADA PAKET PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN TERPADU KECAMATAN KOTA BANGUN DI DINAS PERHUBUNGAN KABUPATEN KUTAI KERTANEGARA PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TIMUR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · fine IDR 735,264,000 · barred from tenders for 1 year · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

350. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Tanjung Nusa Persada

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 27 December 2011 · case 07/KPPU-I/2011 · TENDER PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN LAUT SAMBOJA, PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN TERPADU DI KECAMATAN KOTA BANGUN PADA PAKET PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN TERPADU KECAMATAN KOTA BANGUN DI DINAS PERHUBUNGAN KABUPATEN KUTAI KERTANEGARA PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TIMUR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · fine IDR 703,296,000,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

351. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Budiindah Muliamandiri

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 27 December 2011 · case 07/KPPU-I/2011 · TENDER PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN LAUT SAMBOJA, PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN TERPADU DI KECAMATAN KOTA BANGUN PADA PAKET PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN TERPADU KECAMATAN KOTA BANGUN DI DINAS PERHUBUNGAN KABUPATEN KUTAI KERTANEGARA PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TIMUR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · fine IDR 703,296,000,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

352. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Yala Persada Angkasa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 27 December 2011 · case 07/KPPU-I/2011 · TENDER PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN LAUT SAMBOJA, PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN TERPADU DI KECAMATAN KOTA BANGUN PADA PAKET PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN TERPADU KECAMATAN KOTA BANGUN DI DINAS PERHUBUNGAN KABUPATEN KUTAI KERTANEGARA PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TIMUR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · barred from tenders for 1 year · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

353. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Pagar Siring Group

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 27 December 2011 · case 07/KPPU-I/2011 · TENDER PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN LAUT SAMBOJA, PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN TERPADU DI KECAMATAN KOTA BANGUN PADA PAKET PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN TERPADU KECAMATAN KOTA BANGUN DI DINAS PERHUBUNGAN KABUPATEN KUTAI KERTANEGARA PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TIMUR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · fine IDR 703,296,000,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

354. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Citra Mandiri Pratama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 18 November 2011 · case 08/KPPU-I/2011 · TENDER PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN LAUT SAMBOJA, PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN TERPADU DI KECAMATAN KOTA BANGUN PADA PAKET PEKERJAAN PENDAMPING KEGIATAN PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN TERPADU DINAS PERHUBUNGAN KABUPATEN KUTAI KARTANEGARA PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TIMUR · fine IDR 15,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

355. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Karunia Adhi Yasa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 18 November 2011 · case 08/KPPU-I/2011 · TENDER PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN LAUT SAMBOJA, PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN TERPADU DI KECAMATAN KOTA BANGUN PADA PAKET PEKERJAAN PENDAMPING KEGIATAN PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN TERPADU DINAS PERHUBUNGAN KABUPATEN KUTAI KARTANEGARA PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TIMUR · fine IDR 15,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

356. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Kaltim Citra Alzena

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 18 November 2011 · case 08/KPPU-I/2011 · TENDER PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN LAUT SAMBOJA, PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN TERPADU DI KECAMATAN KOTA BANGUN PADA PAKET PEKERJAAN PENDAMPING KEGIATAN PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN TERPADU DINAS PERHUBUNGAN KABUPATEN KUTAI KARTANEGARA PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TIMUR · fine IDR 15,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

357. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Bangun Bumi Pertiwi

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 18 November 2011 · case 08/KPPU-I/2011 · TENDER PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN LAUT SAMBOJA, PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN TERPADU DI KECAMATAN KOTA BANGUN PADA PAKET PEKERJAAN PENDAMPING KEGIATAN PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN TERPADU DINAS PERHUBUNGAN KABUPATEN KUTAI KARTANEGARA PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TIMUR · fine IDR 15,000,000 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

358. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Citra Bangun Adigraha dan PT. Bima Putra Bangsa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 19 October 2011 · case 03/KPPU-L/2011 · TENDER PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN DAN PENINGKATAN JARINGAN IRIGASI JANGKANG KOMPLEK DI DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN SANGGAU, PROPINSI KALIMANTAN BARAT · fine IDR 651,000,000 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

359. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Telaga Megabuana

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 19 October 2011 · case 03/KPPU-L/2011 · TENDER PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN DAN PENINGKATAN JARINGAN IRIGASI JANGKANG KOMPLEK DI DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN SANGGAU, PROPINSI KALIMANTAN BARAT · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

360. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Galih Medan Persada

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 19 October 2011 · case 03/KPPU-L/2011 · TENDER PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN DAN PENINGKATAN JARINGAN IRIGASI JANGKANG KOMPLEK DI DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN SANGGAU, PROPINSI KALIMANTAN BARAT · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

361. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Simbara Kirana

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 19 October 2011 · case 03/KPPU-L/2011 · TENDER PEKERJAAN PEMBANGUNAN DAN PENINGKATAN JARINGAN IRIGASI JANGKANG KOMPLEK DI DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN SANGGAU, PROPINSI KALIMANTAN BARAT · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

362. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Hatmo Nugroho Sentoso

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 August 2011 · case 02/KPPU-L/2011 · PELELANGAN PROYEK PEMBANGUNAN JALAN TENGGARONG – SAMBOJA, PERBATASAN DENGAN BALIKPAPAN · fine IDR 100,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

363. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Permata Hati

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 August 2011 · case 02/KPPU-L/2011 · PELELANGAN PROYEK PEMBANGUNAN JALAN TENGGARONG – SAMBOJA, PERBATASAN DENGAN BALIKPAPAN · fine IDR 100,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

364. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Sumber Anugrah Raya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 August 2011 · case 02/KPPU-L/2011 · PELELANGAN PROYEK PEMBANGUNAN JALAN TENGGARONG – SAMBOJA, PERBATASAN DENGAN BALIKPAPAN · fine IDR 100,000,000 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

365. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Gita Persada

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 13 May 2011 · case 41/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER PENGADAAN SARANA DAN PRASARANA KONVERSI ENERGI DI LINGKUNGAN DIREKTORAT JENDERAL MINYAK DAN GAS BUMI DEPARTEMEN ENERGI DAN SUMBER DAYA MINERAL TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · fine IDR 1 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

366. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Nusa Consultans

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 13 May 2011 · case 41/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER PENGADAAN SARANA DAN PRASARANA KONVERSI ENERGI DI LINGKUNGAN DIREKTORAT JENDERAL MINYAK DAN GAS BUMI DEPARTEMEN ENERGI DAN SUMBER DAYA MINERAL TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · fine IDR 655 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

367. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Extensa Winaya Fakta

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 13 May 2011 · case 41/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER PENGADAAN SARANA DAN PRASARANA KONVERSI ENERGI DI LINGKUNGAN DIREKTORAT JENDERAL MINYAK DAN GAS BUMI DEPARTEMEN ENERGI DAN SUMBER DAYA MINERAL TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · fine IDR 451 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

368. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Laras Respati Utama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 13 May 2011 · case 41/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER PENGADAAN SARANA DAN PRASARANA KONVERSI ENERGI DI LINGKUNGAN DIREKTORAT JENDERAL MINYAK DAN GAS BUMI DEPARTEMEN ENERGI DAN SUMBER DAYA MINERAL TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · fine IDR 381 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

369. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Data Aksara Matra

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 13 May 2011 · case 41/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER PENGADAAN SARANA DAN PRASARANA KONVERSI ENERGI DI LINGKUNGAN DIREKTORAT JENDERAL MINYAK DAN GAS BUMI DEPARTEMEN ENERGI DAN SUMBER DAYA MINERAL TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · fine IDR 335 · respondent IX of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

370. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     Konsorsium PT. Surveyor Indonesia dengan PT. Sucofindo

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 13 May 2011 · case 41/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER PENGADAAN SARANA DAN PRASARANA KONVERSI ENERGI DI LINGKUNGAN DIREKTORAT JENDERAL MINYAK DAN GAS BUMI DEPARTEMEN ENERGI DAN SUMBER DAYA MINERAL TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · fine IDR 220 · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

371. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Ciptanusa Buana Sentosa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 13 May 2011 · case 41/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER PENGADAAN SARANA DAN PRASARANA KONVERSI ENERGI DI LINGKUNGAN DIREKTORAT JENDERAL MINYAK DAN GAS BUMI DEPARTEMEN ENERGI DAN SUMBER DAYA MINERAL TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · fine IDR 667 · respondent VII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

372. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Kencana Mandiri Uli Nusantara

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 13 May 2011 · case 41/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER PENGADAAN SARANA DAN PRASARANA KONVERSI ENERGI DI LINGKUNGAN DIREKTORAT JENDERAL MINYAK DAN GAS BUMI DEPARTEMEN ENERGI DAN SUMBER DAYA MINERAL TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · fine IDR 267 · respondent VIII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

373. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Rasicipta Consultama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 13 May 2011 · case 41/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER PENGADAAN SARANA DAN PRASARANA KONVERSI ENERGI DI LINGKUNGAN DIREKTORAT JENDERAL MINYAK DAN GAS BUMI DEPARTEMEN ENERGI DAN SUMBER DAYA MINERAL TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · fine IDR 312 · respondent X of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

374. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Djoyokusumo Margo Utomo

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 30 March 2011 · case 40/KPPU-L/2010 · PELELANGAN PEKERJAAN PENGADAAN DAN PEMASANGAN MARKA DI DINAS PERHUBUNGAN PROVINSI JAWA BARAT · fine IDR 25,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

375. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Lintasmarga Nusantara Djaya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 30 March 2011 · case 40/KPPU-L/2010 · PELELANGAN PEKERJAAN PENGADAAN DAN PEMASANGAN MARKA DI DINAS PERHUBUNGAN PROVINSI JAWA BARAT · fine IDR 10,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

376. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Kelsri

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 March 2011 · case 38/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG CONTRACT PACKAGE NO. 3A BOJONEGARA – CIKANDE DISTRIBUTION PIPELINE · fine IDR 6,000,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

377. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) Tbk

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 4 March 2011 · case 38/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG CONTRACT PACKAGE NO. 3A BOJONEGARA – CIKANDE DISTRIBUTION PIPELINE · fine IDR 6,000,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

378. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Huabei Petroleum Service

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 9 December 2010 · case 31/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER NO. SPM-002 INTEGRATED DRILLING SERVICES FOR EXPLORATION WELLS IN MADURA ISLAND BLOCK · fine IDR 2,500,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

379. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     SPE Petroleum, Ltd

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 9 December 2010 · case 31/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER NO. SPM-002 INTEGRATED DRILLING SERVICES FOR EXPLORATION WELLS IN MADURA ISLAND BLOCK · fine IDR 2,500,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

380. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Sumber Sinar Surya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 November 2010 · case 29/KPPU-L/2010 · PENGADAAN PESTISIDA UNTUK PEREMAJAAN, REHABILITASI, DAN INTENSIFIKASI KEGIATAN GERAKAN PENINGKATAN PRODUKSI DAN MUTU KAKAO NASIONAL TAHUN 2009 SATKER DINAS PERKEBUNAN DAN HOLTIKULTURA PROVINSI SULAWESI TENGGARA · fine IDR 1,500,000,000 · barred from tenders for 1 year (Indonesia) · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

381. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV. Simpati Jaya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 November 2010 · case 29/KPPU-L/2010 · PENGADAAN PESTISIDA UNTUK PEREMAJAAN, REHABILITASI, DAN INTENSIFIKASI KEGIATAN GERAKAN PENINGKATAN PRODUKSI DAN MUTU KAKAO NASIONAL TAHUN 2009 SATKER DINAS PERKEBUNAN DAN HOLTIKULTURA PROVINSI SULAWESI TENGGARA · fine IDR 500,000,000 · barred from tenders for 1 year (Indonesia) · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

382. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV Abadi Jaya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 November 2010 · case 29/KPPU-L/2010 · PENGADAAN PESTISIDA UNTUK PEREMAJAAN, REHABILITASI, DAN INTENSIFIKASI KEGIATAN GERAKAN PENINGKATAN PRODUKSI DAN MUTU KAKAO NASIONAL TAHUN 2009 SATKER DINAS PERKEBUNAN DAN HOLTIKULTURA PROVINSI SULAWESI TENGGARA · fine IDR 500,000,000 · barred from tenders for 1 year (Indonesia) · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

383. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV. Sumber Agro Hutama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 November 2010 · case 29/KPPU-L/2010 · PENGADAAN PESTISIDA UNTUK PEREMAJAAN, REHABILITASI, DAN INTENSIFIKASI KEGIATAN GERAKAN PENINGKATAN PRODUKSI DAN MUTU KAKAO NASIONAL TAHUN 2009 SATKER DINAS PERKEBUNAN DAN HOLTIKULTURA PROVINSI SULAWESI TENGGARA · fine IDR 500,000,000 · barred from tenders for 1 year (Indonesia) · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

384. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Putri Karimun Sejati

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 22 November 2010 · case 30/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER 6 (ENAM) PAKET PEKERJAAN DI LINGKUNGAN UNIT PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA (UPBJ) PEMERINTAH KABUPATEN LINGGA TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · fine IDR 151,100,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

385. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Bangun Cipta Nusa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 22 November 2010 · case 30/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER 6 (ENAM) PAKET PEKERJAAN DI LINGKUNGAN UNIT PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA (UPBJ) PEMERINTAH KABUPATEN LINGGA TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · fine IDR 95,090,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

386. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Faedah

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 22 November 2010 · case 30/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER 6 (ENAM) PAKET PEKERJAAN DI LINGKUNGAN UNIT PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA (UPBJ) PEMERINTAH KABUPATEN LINGGA TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · fine IDR 99,200,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

387. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Seranggong Karya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 22 November 2010 · case 30/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER 6 (ENAM) PAKET PEKERJAAN DI LINGKUNGAN UNIT PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA (UPBJ) PEMERINTAH KABUPATEN LINGGA TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · fine IDR 97,100,000 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

388. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Eka Balingga

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 22 November 2010 · case 30/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER 6 (ENAM) PAKET PEKERJAAN DI LINGKUNGAN UNIT PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA (UPBJ) PEMERINTAH KABUPATEN LINGGA TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · respondent IX of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

389. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Caturarya Lautan Lingga

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 22 November 2010 · case 30/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER 6 (ENAM) PAKET PEKERJAAN DI LINGKUNGAN UNIT PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA (UPBJ) PEMERINTAH KABUPATEN LINGGA TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · fine IDR 63,100,000 · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

390. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Tri Alam Penagi

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 22 November 2010 · case 30/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER 6 (ENAM) PAKET PEKERJAAN DI LINGKUNGAN UNIT PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA (UPBJ) PEMERINTAH KABUPATEN LINGGA TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · respondent VI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

391. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Mira

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 22 November 2010 · case 30/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER 6 (ENAM) PAKET PEKERJAAN DI LINGKUNGAN UNIT PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA (UPBJ) PEMERINTAH KABUPATEN LINGGA TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · respondent VII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

392. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Multi Sindo Internasional

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 22 November 2010 · case 30/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER 6 (ENAM) PAKET PEKERJAAN DI LINGKUNGAN UNIT PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA (UPBJ) PEMERINTAH KABUPATEN LINGGA TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · respondent VIII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

393. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Prima Cipta Megah

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 22 November 2010 · case 30/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER 6 (ENAM) PAKET PEKERJAAN DI LINGKUNGAN UNIT PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA (UPBJ) PEMERINTAH KABUPATEN LINGGA TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · respondent X of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

394. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Surya Eka Lestari

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 15 November 2010 · case 26/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PEKERJAAN DI DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM BINA MARGA KABUPATEN OGAN KOMERING ULU PROVINSI SUMATERA SELATAN · fine IDR 59,743,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

395. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Wahyu Wide

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 15 November 2010 · case 26/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PEKERJAAN DI DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM BINA MARGA KABUPATEN OGAN KOMERING ULU PROVINSI SUMATERA SELATAN · fine IDR 226,782,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

396. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Sentosa Raya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 15 November 2010 · case 26/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PEKERJAAN DI DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM BINA MARGA KABUPATEN OGAN KOMERING ULU PROVINSI SUMATERA SELATAN · fine IDR 659,123,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

397. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Nusantara Membangun

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 15 November 2010 · case 26/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PEKERJAAN DI DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM BINA MARGA KABUPATEN OGAN KOMERING ULU PROVINSI SUMATERA SELATAN · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

398. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Surya Prima Abadi

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 15 November 2010 · case 26/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PEKERJAAN DI DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM BINA MARGA KABUPATEN OGAN KOMERING ULU PROVINSI SUMATERA SELATAN · fine IDR 599,499,000 · respondent IX of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

399. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Cinta Famili

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 15 November 2010 · case 26/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PEKERJAAN DI DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM BINA MARGA KABUPATEN OGAN KOMERING ULU PROVINSI SUMATERA SELATAN · fine IDR 187,275,000 · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

400. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Bintang Selatan Agung

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 15 November 2010 · case 26/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PEKERJAAN DI DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM BINA MARGA KABUPATEN OGAN KOMERING ULU PROVINSI SUMATERA SELATAN · respondent VI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

401. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Arga Makmur Mandiri

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 15 November 2010 · case 26/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PEKERJAAN DI DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM BINA MARGA KABUPATEN OGAN KOMERING ULU PROVINSI SUMATERA SELATAN · respondent VII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

402. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Alam Baru Persada

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 15 November 2010 · case 26/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PEKERJAAN DI DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM BINA MARGA KABUPATEN OGAN KOMERING ULU PROVINSI SUMATERA SELATAN · fine IDR 52,428,000 · respondent VIII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

403. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Dwi Perkasa Mandiri

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 15 November 2010 · case 26/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PEKERJAAN DI DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM BINA MARGA KABUPATEN OGAN KOMERING ULU PROVINSI SUMATERA SELATAN · respondent X of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

404. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Nugraha Adi Taruna

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 15 November 2010 · case 26/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PEKERJAAN DI DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM BINA MARGA KABUPATEN OGAN KOMERING ULU PROVINSI SUMATERA SELATAN · respondent XI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

405. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Mahalini Jaya Manggala

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 15 November 2010 · case 26/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PEKERJAAN DI DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM BINA MARGA KABUPATEN OGAN KOMERING ULU PROVINSI SUMATERA SELATAN · respondent XII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

406. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Gemilang Permai

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 15 November 2010 · case 26/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PEKERJAAN DI DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM BINA MARGA KABUPATEN OGAN KOMERING ULU PROVINSI SUMATERA SELATAN · respondent XIII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

407. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Medika Jaya Utama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 15 November 2010 · case 26/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PEKERJAAN DI DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM BINA MARGA KABUPATEN OGAN KOMERING ULU PROVINSI SUMATERA SELATAN · respondent XIV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

408. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Bunga Mulia Indah

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 15 November 2010 · case 26/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PEKERJAAN DI DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM BINA MARGA KABUPATEN OGAN KOMERING ULU PROVINSI SUMATERA SELATAN · fine IDR 449,844,000 · respondent XV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

409. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Gading Cempaka Graha

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 15 November 2010 · case 26/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PEKERJAAN DI DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM BINA MARGA KABUPATEN OGAN KOMERING ULU PROVINSI SUMATERA SELATAN · respondent XVI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

410. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Alam Permai Indah Mandiri

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 15 November 2010 · case 26/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PEKERJAAN DI DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM BINA MARGA KABUPATEN OGAN KOMERING ULU PROVINSI SUMATERA SELATAN · respondent XVII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

411. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Dua Sepakat

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 15 November 2010 · case 26/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PEKERJAAN DI DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM BINA MARGA KABUPATEN OGAN KOMERING ULU PROVINSI SUMATERA SELATAN · respondent XVIII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

412. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Sekawan Maju Bersama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 15 November 2010 · case 26/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PEKERJAAN DI DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM BINA MARGA KABUPATEN OGAN KOMERING ULU PROVINSI SUMATERA SELATAN · respondent XX of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

413. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Asria Nurlindra Inti Sejahtera

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 5 November 2010 · case 33/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER PAKET PEKERJAAN DI DINAS BINA MARGA, SUMBER DAYA AIR DAN ESDM KOTA SINGKAWANG · fine IDR 40,000,000 · barred from tenders for 1 year (Kabupaten Singkawang) · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

414. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Asria Jaya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 5 November 2010 · case 33/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER PAKET PEKERJAAN DI DINAS BINA MARGA, SUMBER DAYA AIR DAN ESDM KOTA SINGKAWANG · barred from tenders for 1 year (Kabupaten Singkawang) · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

415. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Syari Yulia Aryza

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 5 November 2010 · case 33/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER PAKET PEKERJAAN DI DINAS BINA MARGA, SUMBER DAYA AIR DAN ESDM KOTA SINGKAWANG · fine IDR 100,000,000 · barred from tenders for 1 year (Kabupaten Singkawang) · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

416. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Aulia Reza Group

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 5 November 2010 · case 33/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER PAKET PEKERJAAN DI DINAS BINA MARGA, SUMBER DAYA AIR DAN ESDM KOTA SINGKAWANG · barred from tenders for 1 year (Kabupaten Singkawang) · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

417. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Baresa Jaya Bersama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 5 November 2010 · case 33/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER PAKET PEKERJAAN DI DINAS BINA MARGA, SUMBER DAYA AIR DAN ESDM KOTA SINGKAWANG · fine IDR 55,000,000 · barred from tenders for 1 year (Kabupaten Singkawang) · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

418. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Sebelimbing Raya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 5 November 2010 · case 33/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER PAKET PEKERJAAN DI DINAS BINA MARGA, SUMBER DAYA AIR DAN ESDM KOTA SINGKAWANG · fine IDR 50,000,000 · barred from tenders for 1 year (Kabupaten Singkawang) · respondent VII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

419. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Maju Bersama Sejati

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 3 November 2010 · case 25/KPPU-L/2010 · PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA PEMERINTAH DI LINGKUNGAN DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM PROVINSI RIAU · fine IDR 200,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

420. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Yani Satria Perkasa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 3 November 2010 · case 25/KPPU-L/2010 · PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA PEMERINTAH DI LINGKUNGAN DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM PROVINSI RIAU · fine IDR 100,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

421. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Sepakat Tata Lestari

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 3 November 2010 · case 25/KPPU-L/2010 · PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA PEMERINTAH DI LINGKUNGAN DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM PROVINSI RIAU · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

422. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Daya Bersama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 3 November 2010 · case 25/KPPU-L/2010 · PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA PEMERINTAH DI LINGKUNGAN DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM PROVINSI RIAU · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

423. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Tuah Bersama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 3 November 2010 · case 25/KPPU-L/2010 · PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA PEMERINTAH DI LINGKUNGAN DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM PROVINSI RIAU · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

424. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Usaha Kita Bersama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 3 November 2010 · case 25/KPPU-L/2010 · PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA PEMERINTAH DI LINGKUNGAN DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM PROVINSI RIAU · respondent VI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

425. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Putra Rokan

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 3 November 2010 · case 25/KPPU-L/2010 · PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA PEMERINTAH DI LINGKUNGAN DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM PROVINSI RIAU · respondent VII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

426. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Multi Widyatama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 19 October 2010 · case 22/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER PAKET PEKERJAAN REKLAMASI PERLUASAN OPEN STORAGE PELABUHAN CPO KABIL · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

427. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Multi Prima

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 19 October 2010 · case 22/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER PAKET PEKERJAAN REKLAMASI PERLUASAN OPEN STORAGE PELABUHAN CPO KABIL · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

428. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Sarana Asean

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 October 2010 · case 19/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER KONSTRUKSI BIDANG JALAN DAN JEMBATAN KABUPATEN BENGKALIS · fine IDR 100,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

429. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Citra Marapalam Solusindo

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 October 2010 · case 19/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER KONSTRUKSI BIDANG JALAN DAN JEMBATAN KABUPATEN BENGKALIS · barred from tenders for 1 year · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

430. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Bumi Melayu Indah Sejahtera

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 October 2010 · case 19/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER KONSTRUKSI BIDANG JALAN DAN JEMBATAN KABUPATEN BENGKALIS · fine IDR 150,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

431. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Awani Rizki

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 October 2010 · case 19/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER KONSTRUKSI BIDANG JALAN DAN JEMBATAN KABUPATEN BENGKALIS · barred from tenders for 1 year · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

432. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Bina Riau Sejahtera

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 October 2010 · case 19/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER KONSTRUKSI BIDANG JALAN DAN JEMBATAN KABUPATEN BENGKALIS · barred from tenders for 1 year · respondent IX of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

433. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Lingkar Nusa Raya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 October 2010 · case 19/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER KONSTRUKSI BIDANG JALAN DAN JEMBATAN KABUPATEN BENGKALIS · fine IDR 100,000,000 · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

434. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Melayu Riau

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 October 2010 · case 19/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER KONSTRUKSI BIDANG JALAN DAN JEMBATAN KABUPATEN BENGKALIS · barred from tenders for 1 year · respondent VI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

435. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Melayu Riau Persada

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 October 2010 · case 19/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER KONSTRUKSI BIDANG JALAN DAN JEMBATAN KABUPATEN BENGKALIS · fine IDR 300,000,000 · respondent VII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

436. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Surya Gemilang Indah

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 October 2010 · case 19/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER KONSTRUKSI BIDANG JALAN DAN JEMBATAN KABUPATEN BENGKALIS · fine IDR 300,000,000 · respondent VIII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

437. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Berkat Yakin Gemilang

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 October 2010 · case 19/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER KONSTRUKSI BIDANG JALAN DAN JEMBATAN KABUPATEN BENGKALIS · barred from tenders for 1 year · respondent X of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

438. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Teisa Mandiri

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 October 2010 · case 19/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER KONSTRUKSI BIDANG JALAN DAN JEMBATAN KABUPATEN BENGKALIS · fine IDR 150,000,000 · respondent XI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

439. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Neka Rita

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 October 2010 · case 19/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER KONSTRUKSI BIDANG JALAN DAN JEMBATAN KABUPATEN BENGKALIS · fine IDR 75,000,000 · respondent XII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

440. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Indra Sejati

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 October 2010 · case 19/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER KONSTRUKSI BIDANG JALAN DAN JEMBATAN KABUPATEN BENGKALIS · fine IDR 100,000,000 · respondent XIII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

441. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Ranah Katialo

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 October 2010 · case 19/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER KONSTRUKSI BIDANG JALAN DAN JEMBATAN KABUPATEN BENGKALIS · barred from tenders for 1 year · respondent XIV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

442. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Lancang Kuning Graha

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 October 2010 · case 19/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER KONSTRUKSI BIDANG JALAN DAN JEMBATAN KABUPATEN BENGKALIS · barred from tenders for 1 year · respondent XIX of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

443. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Rimbo Peraduan

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 October 2010 · case 19/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER KONSTRUKSI BIDANG JALAN DAN JEMBATAN KABUPATEN BENGKALIS · fine IDR 125,000,000 · respondent XV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

444. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Cipta Bangun Abadi

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 October 2010 · case 19/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER KONSTRUKSI BIDANG JALAN DAN JEMBATAN KABUPATEN BENGKALIS · barred from tenders for 1 year · respondent XVI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

445. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Arisfan Mitra

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 October 2010 · case 19/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER KONSTRUKSI BIDANG JALAN DAN JEMBATAN KABUPATEN BENGKALIS · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent XVII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

446. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Bina Tama Sejahtera

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 October 2010 · case 19/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER KONSTRUKSI BIDANG JALAN DAN JEMBATAN KABUPATEN BENGKALIS · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent XVIII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

447. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Putera Rajawali Gemilang

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 October 2010 · case 19/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER KONSTRUKSI BIDANG JALAN DAN JEMBATAN KABUPATEN BENGKALIS · barred from tenders for 1 year · respondent XX of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

448. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Superita Indoperkasa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 October 2010 · case 19/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER KONSTRUKSI BIDANG JALAN DAN JEMBATAN KABUPATEN BENGKALIS · fine IDR 150,000,000 · respondent XXI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

449. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Pratama Setya Graha

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 October 2010 · case 19/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER KONSTRUKSI BIDANG JALAN DAN JEMBATAN KABUPATEN BENGKALIS · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent XXII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

450. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV Yogi Pratama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 October 2010 · case 20/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER KEGIATAN KEBERSIHAN KANTOR SEKRETARIAT DAERAH PROVINSI RIAU · fine IDR 179,216,400 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

451. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV. Fitrah Riau Sejahtera

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 October 2010 · case 20/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER KEGIATAN KEBERSIHAN KANTOR SEKRETARIAT DAERAH PROVINSI RIAU · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

452. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Putra Hari Mandiri

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 October 2010 · case 20/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER KEGIATAN KEBERSIHAN KANTOR SEKRETARIAT DAERAH PROVINSI RIAU · fine IDR 427,588,500 · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

453. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Pagar Alam Perkasa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 October 2010 · case 20/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER KEGIATAN KEBERSIHAN KANTOR SEKRETARIAT DAERAH PROVINSI RIAU · barred from tenders for 2 years · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

454. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Mustika Bintang Sakti

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 September 2010 · case 14/KPPU-L/2010 · PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA PEMBORONGAN DAN JASA KONSULTAN PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN TEBO, JAMBI · fine IDR 1,240,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

455. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Tembesu Jaya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 September 2010 · case 14/KPPU-L/2010 · PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA PEMBORONGAN DAN JASA KONSULTAN PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN TEBO, JAMBI · fine IDR 800,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

456. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Merangin Karya Sejati

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 September 2010 · case 14/KPPU-L/2010 · PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA PEMBORONGAN DAN JASA KONSULTAN PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN TEBO, JAMBI · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

457. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Karya Bahari

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 September 2010 · case 14/KPPU-L/2010 · PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA PEMBORONGAN DAN JASA KONSULTAN PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN TEBO, JAMBI · respondent IX of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

458. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Kreasindo Kenari Mulya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 September 2010 · case 14/KPPU-L/2010 · PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA PEMBORONGAN DAN JASA KONSULTAN PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN TEBO, JAMBI · fine IDR 160,000,000 · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

459. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Dwi Karsa Rizki

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 September 2010 · case 14/KPPU-L/2010 · PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA PEMBORONGAN DAN JASA KONSULTAN PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN TEBO, JAMBI · fine IDR 145,000,000 · respondent VI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

460. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Samudera Indah

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 September 2010 · case 14/KPPU-L/2010 · PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA PEMBORONGAN DAN JASA KONSULTAN PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN TEBO, JAMBI · fine IDR 85,000,000 · respondent VII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

461. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Wahyunata Arsita

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 September 2010 · case 14/KPPU-L/2010 · PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA PEMBORONGAN DAN JASA KONSULTAN PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN TEBO, JAMBI · respondent VIII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

462. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Putri Prabu Jakso

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 September 2010 · case 14/KPPU-L/2010 · PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA PEMBORONGAN DAN JASA KONSULTAN PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN TEBO, JAMBI · respondent X of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

463. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Jaya Abadi Sumber Pasifik

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 September 2010 · case 14/KPPU-L/2010 · PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA PEMBORONGAN DAN JASA KONSULTAN PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN TEBO, JAMBI · fine IDR 275,000,000 · respondent XI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

464. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Sumber Sedayu

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 September 2010 · case 14/KPPU-L/2010 · PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA PEMBORONGAN DAN JASA KONSULTAN PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN TEBO, JAMBI · respondent XII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

465. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Sanubari Megah Perkasa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 23 September 2010 · case 14/KPPU-L/2010 · PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA PEMBORONGAN DAN JASA KONSULTAN PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN TEBO, JAMBI · respondent XIII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

466. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Putra Hadi

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 22 September 2010 · case 18/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN GEDUNG ASRAMA MAHASISWA MA – HAD ALY UIN ALAUDDIN MAKASSAR · fine IDR 100,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

467. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Dyan Nugraha Saotanre

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 22 September 2010 · case 18/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN GEDUNG ASRAMA MAHASISWA MA – HAD ALY UIN ALAUDDIN MAKASSAR · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

468. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Pratama Godean Jaya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 22 September 2010 · case 18/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN GEDUNG ASRAMA MAHASISWA MA – HAD ALY UIN ALAUDDIN MAKASSAR · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

469. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Karya Murni Anugerah

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 20 September 2010 · case 09/KPPU-L/2010 · PAKET PEKERJAAN TANGGUL PENGAMAN TERMASUK JALAN INSPEKSI (TPJIP) TELUK TAHUNA KABUPATEN KEPULAUAN SANGIHE · fine IDR 400,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

470. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Karya Kasih Anugerah

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 20 September 2010 · case 09/KPPU-L/2010 · PAKET PEKERJAAN TANGGUL PENGAMAN TERMASUK JALAN INSPEKSI (TPJIP) TELUK TAHUNA KABUPATEN KEPULAUAN SANGIHE · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

471. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Sangihetama Daya Karya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 20 September 2010 · case 09/KPPU-L/2010 · PAKET PEKERJAAN TANGGUL PENGAMAN TERMASUK JALAN INSPEKSI (TPJIP) TELUK TAHUNA KABUPATEN KEPULAUAN SANGIHE · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

472. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Citranusa Binakarya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 20 September 2010 · case 09/KPPU-L/2010 · PAKET PEKERJAAN TANGGUL PENGAMAN TERMASUK JALAN INSPEKSI (TPJIP) TELUK TAHUNA KABUPATEN KEPULAUAN SANGIHE · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

473. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Manuwo Sangir Jaya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 20 September 2010 · case 09/KPPU-L/2010 · PAKET PEKERJAAN TANGGUL PENGAMAN TERMASUK JALAN INSPEKSI (TPJIP) TELUK TAHUNA KABUPATEN KEPULAUAN SANGIHE · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

474. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Merangin Karya Sejati

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 September 2010 · case 11/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PRAKONSTRUKSI BANDAR UDARA MUARA BUNGO JAMBI · fine IDR 750,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

475. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Jaya Abadi Sumber Pasifik

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 September 2010 · case 11/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PRAKONSTRUKSI BANDAR UDARA MUARA BUNGO JAMBI · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

476. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Sanubari Megah Perkasa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 September 2010 · case 11/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PRAKONSTRUKSI BANDAR UDARA MUARA BUNGO JAMBI · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

477. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Riyah Permata Anugerah

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 September 2010 · case 11/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PRAKONSTRUKSI BANDAR UDARA MUARA BUNGO JAMBI · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

478. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Paesa Pasindo Engineering

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 September 2010 · case 11/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PRAKONSTRUKSI BANDAR UDARA MUARA BUNGO JAMBI · respondent VI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

479. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Antara Konstruksi

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 17 September 2010 · case 11/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PRAKONSTRUKSI BANDAR UDARA MUARA BUNGO JAMBI · respondent VII of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

480. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Karya Bunga Pantai Ceria Group

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 September 2010 · case 08/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PRAKONSTRUKSI BANDAR UDARA MUARA BUNGO JAMBI · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

481. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Dayatama Beta Mulya

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 September 2010 · case 08/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PRAKONSTRUKSI BANDAR UDARA MUARA BUNGO JAMBI · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

482. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Abun Sendi

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 September 2010 · case 08/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PRAKONSTRUKSI BANDAR UDARA MUARA BUNGO JAMBI · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

483. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Sumber Sedayu

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 6 September 2010 · case 08/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PRAKONSTRUKSI BANDAR UDARA MUARA BUNGO JAMBI · respondent VI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

484. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Kereta Api (Persero)

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 31 August 2010 · case 05/KPPU-L/2010 · PENGADAAN 20 (DUA PULUH) UNIT LOKOMOTIF CC 204 TAHUN 2009 · fine IDR 2,000,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

485. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Pembangunan Perumahan (Persero)

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 19 August 2010 · case 02/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER PEMBANGUNAN RUMAH SAKIT PENDIDIKAN (TEACHING HOSPITAL) TAHAP II UNIVERSITAS HASANUDDIN MAKASSAR · fine IDR 5,000,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

486. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Paesa Pasindo Engineering

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 30 July 2010 · case 10/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PRAKONSTRUKSI BANDAR UDARA MUARA BUNGO JAMBI · fine IDR 100,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

487. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Riyah Permata Anugrah

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 30 July 2010 · case 10/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PRAKONSTRUKSI BANDAR UDARA MUARA BUNGO JAMBI · fine IDR 100,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

488. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT Bintang Selatan Agung

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 30 July 2010 · case 10/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PRAKONSTRUKSI BANDAR UDARA MUARA BUNGO JAMBI · fine IDR 100,000,000 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

489. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Multi Engka Utama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 27 July 2010 · case 03/KPPU-L/2010 · TENDER PENGEMBANGAN DAN PENGELOLAAN JARINGAN IRIGASI, RAWA, DAN JARINGAN PENGAIRAN LAINNYA KABUPATEN PANGKAJENE · barred from tenders for 1 year · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

490. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV Global Inc., pada saat tender

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 27 July 2010 · case 07/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PENGADAAN ALAT-ALAT LABORATORIUM BAHASA DINAS PENDIDIKAN, PEMUDA, DAN OLAHRAGA KABUPATEN KUDUS TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · fine IDR 147,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

491. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV Internasional

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 27 July 2010 · case 07/KPPU-L/2010 · LELANG PENGADAAN ALAT-ALAT LABORATORIUM BAHASA DINAS PENDIDIKAN, PEMUDA, DAN OLAHRAGA KABUPATEN KUDUS TAHUN ANGGARAN 2009 · fine IDR 54,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

492. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Bunga Raya Lestari Jo PT. Citra Nusra Persada

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 16 June 2010 · case 34/KPPU-L/2009 · TENDER PENANGANAN JALAN DAN JEMBATAN KABUPATEN BIMA · fine IDR 1,950,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

493. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Moderna Tehnik Perkasa

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 16 June 2010 · case 34/KPPU-L/2009 · TENDER PENANGANAN JALAN DAN JEMBATAN KABUPATEN BIMA · fine IDR 975,000,000 · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

494. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Sarana Multi Usaha

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 16 June 2010 · case 34/KPPU-L/2009 · TENDER PENANGANAN JALAN DAN JEMBATAN KABUPATEN BIMA · fine IDR 975,000,000 · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

495. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Nasri Niagatama

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 16 June 2010 · case 34/KPPU-L/2009 · TENDER PENANGANAN JALAN DAN JEMBATAN KABUPATEN BIMA · fine IDR 150,000,000 · respondent IV of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

496. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Bima Putera Mandiri

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 16 June 2010 · case 34/KPPU-L/2009 · TENDER PENANGANAN JALAN DAN JEMBATAN KABUPATEN BIMA · fine IDR 75,000,000 · respondent V of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

497. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     CV. Silver

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 16 June 2010 · case 34/KPPU-L/2009 · TENDER PENANGANAN JALAN DAN JEMBATAN KABUPATEN BIMA · fine IDR 75,000,000 · respondent VI of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

498. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Taramulia Setia Pratama Luhur, pelaku usaha

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 1 June 2010 · case 30/KPPU-I/2009 · LELANG BANGUNAN SEKOLAH DAN KESEHATAN KABUPATEN NIAS · fine IDR 200,000,000 · respondent I of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

499. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Untario Metalindo, pelaku usaha

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 1 June 2010 · case 30/KPPU-I/2009 · LELANG BANGUNAN SEKOLAH DAN KESEHATAN KABUPATEN NIAS · respondent II of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

500. Bid rigging in a tender (Article 22, Law 5/1999)

     PT. Eka Perkasa Indah, pelaku usaha

     Authority Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) · From 1 June 2010 · case 30/KPPU-I/2009 · LELANG BANGUNAN SEKOLAH DAN KESEHATAN KABUPATEN NIAS · respondent III of the case; the ruling may have been appealed in court · Source

1 2

Indonesia